• Individuality - by Dr. Gareth Morgan-Jones

• Have A Pet Safe Christmas!  

• Judging The Norsk Rottweiler Klubb by Steve Wolfson

• Rottweiler caricature or is it evolution  

• Extinct Show Dog Breeders

• Skin problems Part I - Allergies or Food Intolerances

• Rottweiler Makes Front Page with Good News  (Kingsport Times News)  

• Plastic Coated Pet Food Kibble?  

• Dog owners face written and practical tests

• Animals As Biological Weapons!  

• More than Meets the Eye

• The Future of Dog Shows

• Rottweiler study links ovaries with exceptional longevity

• Renaming Your Rescue Dog

• American Kennel Club - AKC Breeder

• The Invisible Threat

• BACKBONE GONE?

• DOGS FILL KEY ROLES IN OUR SOCIETY

• ICON OF THE BREED by Steve Wolfson

•  AKC Suspends Victim, Not Perpetrator! 

• Family dog killed after trying to save dying owner 

• Rottweiler honored for stopping Coventry sex attacker

• What I Learned At The Dog Show

• NEW MYSTERY NOVEL FEATURES ROTTWEILERS

• Cosmetic Faults by Steve Wolfson

• Rottweiler Saves Runt Of The Litter's Bacon

• Airline for Pets Takes Wing

• Rottweiler Beats Odds To Return To Family

• SPCA exec's dog dies after being left in hot car

• The Anatomy of a Dog Attack

• Shawnee Kennel Club donates pet oxygen masks

• Service Dog Discrimination in Killeen Texas

• The Biting Truth About Dogs

• Service Dog Discrimination Continues in Texas

• Dogs and their tails

• A Portrait of Heidi

• Animal Rights Activism is Alive and Well In The United States

• Animal Rights = Bloody Murder!

• The Long Island Working Rottweilers ~ A Retrospective

• Why Good Dogs Go Bad

• Rottweilers are Happy Haulers

• Honoring the best darn Rottweiler in Oakley

• AVMA opposes cosmetic ear cropping, tail docking of dogs

• Mandatory Spay / Neuter - Another form of BSL

• Review of the 2008 NERF Seiger Show

• The Truth be Known

• Let's Rock 'N Roll by Dani Canino

• Man in Rottweiler Rescue Case Pleads Guilty

• Sheep Dog

• ASPCA Success Story of the Week

• Lincoln Rottweiler and trainer claim Champion Tracker title

• Obedience Judge PREJUDICE Against Rottweilers

• Town outlaws five dog breeds!

• 10 Tips On How To Photograph Your Dog

• Deja Vu 'nicest Rottweiler in world'

• Fight BSL, It's a Matter of Survival

• Once Is Not Enough

• Dog's Quick Action Deters Moose

• CAUTION - Changing a Breed Standard

• Beware Holiday Hazards For Dogs

• Sleeping with Rottweilers

• Recognizing, Preventing, and Handling Dog Aggression

• Cat is Mans Best Friend

• A Sensible Vicious Dog Law

• Avoiding Harm From Dogs

• Halloween & Hounds

• Rottweiler Nurses Orphan Kitten

• To AKC Judges: Are You Part of the Problem?

• Therapy Dog Comforts Boy with Cancer

• The Rottweiler Pyramid

• Carting helps one breeder win hearts and educate a community 

• Calvin - 2006 Service Dog Of The Year

• Annual show judges top Rottweilers

• THE ABUSE EXCUSE and Why It's Bad For Dogs

• Rottweiler plays Mum to newborn lambs

• Therapy Dogs Help Kids Read

• Born With No Tails

• ARC Region IV Specialty

• Elric - My Assistance Dog

• 8 Wheels, 1 Heart

• Breed Specific Legislation

• Bones, Muscle, Power

• For Sophie, Therapy is a dogs Life

• Warning for pet owners about potentially-deadly pet food

• Faith: Life Saving Rottweiler

• Mysterious Disease Is Flu Strain

• The Dog Who Ate Christmas

• The Foot of the Rottweiler by Steve Wolfson

Judging The Norsk Rottweiler Klubb 
National Specialty Show June 22, 2013
By Steve Wolfson

On June 20, 2013, I traveled to Norway to conduct my seminar on the Rottweiler and judge for the Norsk RottweilerKlubb. Dirk Vandercasteele of Belgium was also invited to judge; he adjudicated bitches and I dogs. It was a small show of 55 entries, yet big on enthusiasm and energy. This assignment would be my first time in Norway and meet Dirk Vandercasteele who was accompanied by his wife Kathleen Vos. The date of the show was special since it was the summer solstice. At that time in Norway, the sun sets at 11PM and rises at 3:45AM!

I would like to extend my thanks and appreciation to Rita Rosberg, the driving force of the show - and her husband Thomas for their hospitality and efforts concerning my seminar and arrangements while in Norway. My appreciation and thanks is also extended to Espen Pedersen and Lisa Iversen for their hospitality and time shuttling me to and from the airport. And a �thank you to all exhibitors and show secretaries - the unsung heroes of all shows - for supporting and working the event. The Norsk Rottweilerklubb hosts a well-organized and efficiently managed specialty.

I conducted my seminar "The Rottweiler In Type: Discussions on Breed Type, Structure and their Correlation to Locomotion", the day prior to the show. It was attended by 15 enthusiasts. The seminar is a Power Point presentation that attempts to simplify the parts of the standard facilitating a more thorough understanding. It is a valuable teaching tool. When the seminar concluded, we progressed to a hands on application of what was discussed via several demonstration dogs. I had a few brave volunteers critique the demo dogs. The hands on segment is an essential way to learn the standard by applying its information through the "critique". For a brief time, the volunteers shared a judge's perspective.

Since I judged only dogs, my comments are limited to the males. The ring size for the show was good and large enough to adequately assess movement - one cannot completely evaluate canine gait in a small ring. Most dog exhibits were excellent in type, construction and movement. Head type was generally strong with good skull to muzzle ratios, good pronunciation of the zygomatic arch and stop and good width of the muzzle at the base. One exhibit possessed a slight dome shaped top-skull and slightly shorter than correct length of the muzzle. This trend  the dome shape top-skull accompanied by an unusually short muzzle, which we are seeing in many dogs interestingly not in bitches is the head of Boxer, not correct and very dangerous! Despite this exhibit demonstrating a slight exaggeration in the arch of the top-skull and borderline short muzzle, both traits were within the limit of acceptability.

Eye color was dark and the shape of the eyes were generally excellent. Gum pigmentation was dark. Most had good bone substance and good markings. Some had sooty markings and a couple possessed the preferred rich mahogany. Exhibit�s coats were good with their texture ranging from coarse to fine. Dentition was generally good with scissors bites and correct alignment of the teeth. In construction, the front and rear assemblies were moderately angulated. Many exhibits could use improvement in this area with more shoulder layback, more angulation and turn of stifle in the rear. Most stood correct in the front feet and none were hocky. Construction problems encountered were twofold. First, was turning out of the left and right front feet east/west feet- on several exhibits. This problem varied from slight to noticeable. Second, was body length. Too many were long in body with most male exhibits possessing this trait. It is a problem not particular to Norway, but observable worldwide. The standard requires a body length to height ratio of 10 to 9, compact in appearance. Many exhibits exceeded this correct ratio.

In movement, I ask that all exhibits move up and back in a straight line. Many judges do not require this. However, it is necessary to assess their lateral gait and render a more complete assessment. With the up and back, I observed some exhibits with soft pasterns and turning out at the elbows. In the side gait, all dog exhibits gaited with sufficient to good front reach and rear drive. Certainly, some gaited better than others with a more harmonious aggressive action in the front and rear. This is why I ask for a large ring and require the exhibits to go around enough times for me to make a complete judgment on their locomotion.

Additional Comments and Observations

Despite not judging bitches, I have some observations that I hope the club will apply in a constructive manner. A noticeable construction fault observed on several bitch exhibits was "sickle hocks". They demonstrated this while standing and gaiting. Its cause is usually an undersized muscle, which controls the Achilles tendon. This fault prohibits the exhibit from fully extending its rear feet and driving its body forward. Perhaps these exhibits have a common ancestor? Another locomotion problem that I observed on a bitch exhibit was �pounding� of the front feet while gaiting. It is an imbalance between the front and rear angulations causing the exhibit to appear as it were running downhill. Construction problems like these are issues that breeders in Norway should address.

I enjoyed my short stay in Norway. The Norsk Rottweilerklubb members are very passionate about the Rottweiler and conveyed this enthusiasm throughout the show. I hope to be invited back in the future.

Steve Wolfson 

Rottweiler caricature or is it evolution
By Ian Geddes-Cook
Hardrada Rottweilers

Over time I have heard people say how much our breed has changed, in some instances for the better, in others for the worse. You may hear people say, where is the size or bone or what�s happening to the head, or clearly formed markings? The question I would ask is, are the dogs changing? Is this process natural evolution or a man made evolutionary process pumped up by people�s view of the breed rather then the actual standard?

I remember in the 1980�s seeing a Rottweiler being billed as the biggest Rottweiler in the country (United Kingdom) and available for stud work. The dog indeed looked like a rotty, correct shape and markings with a somewhat houndy looking head, however, it must have been the size of a great Dane, certainly not within standard but people still used the dog at stud.

The simple answer to my question is that the standards and dogs have been changing for generations. We see judges from overseas checking our dogs for full dentition, yet our standard in New Zealand does not ask for full dentition it states quite simply

Mouth:
"The teeth are strong and the incisors of the lower jaw must touch the inner surface of the upper incisors. The flews are black and firm; they fall gradually away towards the corners of the mouth, which do not protrude excessively". 

Is this variance in standards part of the problem? We have many countries with different standards, but ultimately we all have in our own minds what a Rottweiler should look like. At the confirmation shows a major influence on what determines a great dog or not so good dog is one person judging on the day. In the end one dog will come away with top honours, with the judges decision indicating that his/ her pick is the best specimen on the day. But does it conform to relevant breed standards of the day. In some respects I�m sure it will, but which standard was the dog judged by? Was it the written standard from where the judge came from, or from the country in which they judge is judging in or is it a formulation of what they perceive a good quality Rottweiler should look like?

In 1901 the first Rottweiler standard was published. In fact it was the Rottweiler and Leonberger breed standard of 1901. If you compare that standard with the one we have today, you would see a very different dog including brindle Rottweilers, and dogs lacking bone and substance, with white on chest, legs and neck, with long coats and weaker heads. The intention then and now is to have a breed standard to maintain the breed type. What is breed type you my say, well in my opinion it is the sum total of the individual characteristics which help maintain the breeds individuality and uniqueness.

The question we should all ask is what best conforms to the breed standard. What is a great dog and what is not so great. Judges, breeders, pet owners, exhibitors etc all have a view on this, and interpret this in one way or another. Accordingly in the show world the qualities of our dogs are measured against the breed standard, the aim and expectation is to maintain a breed type, which will typify the unique qualities and individualities of our breed including the both the physical and psychological traits. I must say I've not seen many Rottweilers pulling carts or rounding up cattle these days, but essentially that was the job they were bred for, as we all know when you loose one job you have to find another, ultimately the Rottweiler was used in various roles including the police, army etc and later as the breed became popular in the 1970's onwards, as a family protector and friendly pet.

The breed standard is said to ensure breed type is maintained by assessing and maintaining function, soundness, confirmation, movement, attitude, colour, weight etc .. People talk about Breed Type vs. Soundness, but essentially breed type is the sum total of all these things.

I think the breed is essentially still evolving in two ways, one to match with the standard view given by breed clubs by way of a breed standard, the other is for the breed to fit in with what society expects of the breed. Certainly there is a balancing act , with anti dog laws and anti Rottweiler view, would it be prudent that some traits will have to go, is this a wrong assumption.? I for one see some of my dogs with the original working attitude, but more and more my focus has been to have a dog that is acceptable in society and is well behaved, maybe I am wrong to say this but essentially for the longevity of the breed to continue it needs to evolve into what people want, essentially a loving family pet, there will be those that say that it has become just a caricature of the breed, I can live with that because I don�t feel I'm fooling myself when I breed, I know what my aims and objects are when I breed.

Essentially the breed has made some significant changes in the last 100 years, originally we had two types of Rottweilers, the large big boned butchers dog, who pulled carts for a living and the smaller more agile dog that trotted around rounding up cattle. We can still see both types today as they have not gone away. I still have new pet owners contacting me asking for the biggest dog or biggest head out of a litter, the one they choose is not in my opinion necessarily the best dog, but it conforms to an individuals preference based not upon a standard but upon each persons own interpretation of what fits for them.

The pictures above show two dogs both distantly related, yet the size of bone, heads are so different when comparing the two. It would be interesting to see who of the two dogs would be able to function and work best.
I think change is inevitable, based upon peoples own individual ideas and thoughts on how the breed should be, ultimately it is the role of the breeder to maintain those traits that we think make our breed stand out and gives it that uniqueness that we see and love.

The breed I am sure will continue to alter, their may be slight changes in the wording in the breed standard, but with slight variation I feel dramatic changes tends to occur. Take the head for instance, the head looked many years ago finer with slight stop, little zygoma development and conical muzzle, the head today in many dogs have shorter muzzles and well developed zygoma's, ok but the forehead is starting to become more domed with the general head becoming mastiff like in appearance. Maybe I'm interpreting what I see incorrectly but everybody will have there own interpretation. I think it will be fascinating if we could see what the breed will evolve into in another 100 yrs time, will we recognize it or will it have evolved into something different, may be a caricature of the breed. Only time will tell.

Below is a comparison of the breed, taken from the first original breed standard and the current NZKC Rottweiler standard. The information listed below is split into two columns listing some notable differences. The 1901 standard, or documentation about what a rotty looked like 100 yrs, the second column shows today's standard or what we would expect to see today, I have listed some key differences from then and now, it is not a definitive list.

Extinct Show Dog Breeders
January 2013 - Barbara J. Andrews, Editor-In-Chief, TheDogPress.com

Skin problems Part I - Allergies or Food Intolerances
Originally printed in the B-Naturals Newsletter
Reprinted with permission by Lew Olson, PhD Natural Health 
B-Naturals / Holistic Products For Dogs and Cats

Plastic Coated Pet Food Kibble?
AKC Judge/Exhibition Editor,TheDogPlace.org
Friday, December 9, 2011

Dog owners face written and practical tests
Published: March 21, 2012

Dog owners in Germany are bracing themselves for the introduction of a license which would require passing written and practical tests and could cost hundreds of euros.

Authorities in Lower Saxony passed a law last year requiring owners to prove their basic knowledge about dogs and for the pets to pass a behavior test. Berlin may follow suit.

The Lower Saxony measure takes effect in 2013, although people who can prove they have owned a dog for at least two years since 2003 will be exempt. 

Owners will be tested on their knowledge of dog owner rules and of dogs' needs in general. A practical test of the animal, which can be completed by a veterinarian, will also be required to show that the pet is socialized and not dangerous. 

The rule also requires dog owners to have liability insurance for their pets and that dogs have an identification chip inserted under their skin.

Lower Saxony's agricultural ministry expects dog owners will have to pay around �350 to �550, depending on how much the vet charges, ministry spokesperson Natascha Manski told The Local.

Now Berlin�s authorities, having recorded significant increases in dog bites over the past few years, are working out how to introduce similar licensing rules. 

The number of dog bites reported to authorities rose by 44 to 704 last year, compared to 2010 � a six percent increase. That follows a 30 percent rise in 2010 over 2009.

"That is clearly an alarm signal," Claudia H�mmerling, the animal rights spokeswoman for Berlin's Green party, told the Tagessppiegel newspaper. She noted that of the 704 bites reported, just 32 were attributable to �attack� dog breeds. 

H�mmerling, herself the owner of a Staffordshire Bull Terrier, is working to get a licensing rule similar to that in Lower Saxony through the Berlin state government. 

Under the bill being discussed dogs would be divided into three categories based on size and breed. Attack, hunting and herding dogs would be required to pass additional tests based on the breed's character.

There has been much discussion about the costs, the paper noted. Prices for the written exam would be around �25 and between �50 and �75 for the practical test. 

H�mmerling, who met dog owners on Tuesday evening, said cooperation among the interested parties had been "superb." She did say that many were worried their beloved pet might be taken away if they fail to pass the test.

The Green party politician said she assured owners that the aim of the law was not to separate dog owners from their pets but to make sure people who own canines are responsible.

Asked whether someone would fail if their dog did not come on command, H�mmerling giggled and said: "Whose dog comes on command?" The idea is to show that the dogs are socialized and not a danger to people.

The Local/Germany's News in English 

MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE
Proximity and Knowledge - Keys to Observation
By Carmen L. Battaglia, PhD - Breeding Better Dogs

THE FUTURE OF DOG SHOWS
E. Katie Gammill, AKC Judge/Exhibition Editor,TheDogPlace.org
Friday, December 9, 2011

Do breeders and owner handlers no longer understand the sport of dogs? �Show and go� doesn�t get the job done. You are either in, or you are out.

Examples: People bump a dog up to Specials class without first asking the competitors if they would prefer that the dog stay in the classes and hold the major. People double-enter and don�t show up. Owner handlers drive miles to get to that major only to find someone else �slept in� or didn�t go. Time and again, we hear �the major broke� but sometimes exhibitors come to ringside to get a number and they see a few numbers aren�t picked up and so, assume there is no major. Then due to late pick ups, find it is THEIR FAULT the major didn�t hold because they didn�t compete and the rest of the armbands were picked up at the last minute.

Do breeders still count the �Specials�, especially now with �Awards of Merit� entries, when it comes to possibly winning over the Specials and picking up a major? Sure Groups are tough but a judge gave you the honor of representing your breed and you skip Group competition? And did you know when if ANY breed in the Group has a major, and your dog wins the Group, it counts as a major for your entry?

Breeders Discourage Future Breeders

Breeders are, and will always be, the backbone of the sport and the future of dog shows. When I read we must do things to attract newcomers to our sport, and then hear the complaints from buyers who speak of contracts, breeding restrictions, exorbitant prices, and in some cases rudeness, is it any wonder buyers run to the nearest shelter for their pet? Between our actions, the lack of breeding litters, and restrictions, we don�t have to worry about Animal Activists. We are shooting ourselves in our own proverbial foot!

I have attempted to teach new breeders or owner handlers only to have them disregard my effort. The future of the sport depends on them but I suppose it is the times. I can say �What was� worked a lot better that �What is�. If we refuse to honor the sport of dogs and play by the rules, we defeat our purpose. If we all breed what we like and disregard the standard, we will join the ranks of the �doodle dogs�.

Breeding To The Breed Standard

Another example: Why won�t the breeders and handlers stand up for the Standards? I love breed type, the look of eagles, the virtues that separate one breed from another. I love �cropped ears and docked tails�. A big, substantial Great Dane one can �look in the eye� represents the Apollo of the breed. Nobility is a look; I love the keen presence of each individual breed, be it large or small. I grieve the loss of these attributes, but they can be preserved IF breeders take breeding to standard seriously and evaluate their dogs honestly.

When evaluating dogs, does one keep a dog for a single attribute, or does one choose the overall dog? It starts there. IF you breed for eye improvement and it shows up on the worst puppy in the litter, and you choose to keep that �eye�, the next generation will take you backwards. IF you choose the best overall puppy, keeping your positive virtues intact, your reward comes when you later breed that dog. In the next litter will be a choice of an overall puppy that incorporates the desired eye. This requires patience, but �socks in� your virtues and moves your program forward.

There are breeders, and then there are BREEDERS! True breeders know how to incorporate a virtue into their program without losing their own �look�. Meeting a breeder with four generations of �OFA excellent� hips in her dogs, she asked me how it could be that all puppies in the last litter were dysplastic? I�m no expert in genetics, but I am an expert regarding �You plan, Nature laughs�, keeping us on our toes. It�s always been that way. But the sport and a good breeding program will survive if we just carry on.

Present and Future Breeder Tools

With frozen semen, opportunities are abound. Hesitant at first regarding Award of Merits, I look at it now as an opportunity for newcomers to view many �greats� of many breeds. Frozen semen and Award of Merits allow access to studs long forgotten affords a fresh approach to possibly getting �back on track�.

Many dogs age well and are still breathtaking. Even those who don�t age as well have a certain dignity and presence that is undeniable. It�s regrettable only one dog and one bitch can be recognized when so many are so deserving. Take advantage of this opportunity to improve your breeding program.

The future of dog shows and that of your breed is in your hands. It�s a worthwhile responsibility. Don�t sit back and think others are fighting the battle to preserve either one just for you. Get involved before it�s too late and the privilege of owning a dog is taken from us all. BREEDERS ARE THE FUTURE OF THE SPORT.

Rottweiler study links ovaries with exceptional longevity
AVMA Journals

Renaming Your Rescue Dog
by Darlene Arden (Subscribe to Darlene Arden's posts) 
Aug 25th 2011 @ 1:00PM Filed Under: Dogs, Pet Adoption

There are few things in life as rewarding as giving a homeless animal a second chance at life. Some have never had a proper home, many have never had a good home and some have lost their home because of their owner's life circumstances, often the death of the owner or the birth of a child who is dangerous allergic to pets.

One question that often arises is whether or not to give your new dog a new name. This may sound frivolous to some but it's a serious question and a real consideration. Here's my "rule of thumb" for renaming a dog.

If the dog has been in a loving home and has only positive associations with his name, I advise keeping the name. He has already lost so much in life, why subject him to losing the last familiar thing? It will help make the transition easier if he knows that you're talking specifically to him. Acknowledge who he is and always use his name in a loving tone of voice. 

On the other hand, there are certainly times when changing your dog's name is advisable, when he needs a fresh start in every possible way, including a new name. In some cases, the dog may have been brought into a shelter off the street and has no name. In that case, the shelter volunteers have named him but his only real association with the name is a loud, cold, noisy shelter environment and what little affection the volunteers can spare when it has to be spread among so many animals. In other cases, the dog has a bad association with his name. These are often the dogs that have been relinquished to shelters. In Breed Rescue Groups, volunteers foster the dogs to help them make the transition to a new home so, for our purposes, we'll be concentrating on shelter dogs or those off the street who have appeared in your life.

Usually, dogs who have been relinquished by their owners have come with some sort of history or their reaction to volunteers can tell part of the story just by watching their body language. While most small dogs are given up because of housetraining issues, many people get a dog and get tired of it so they stick the dog in the backyard, totally ignoring this living, breathing, sentient being. Or they get bored. Or they no longer want the responsibility, or it grew bigger than they thought. The human-animal bond means nothing to these people and it is the dog that suffers. Other people take out their hostilities on the dog, hitting it, screaming at it, kicking it , etc. Not one of these dogs will have a positive association with his or her name. These dogs have often been called by name only to be punished, they've been screamed at, they've been abused.

Along with the tender, loving care you provide a new name will help set the tone for a new life.

Naming your adopted dog will give you both a fresh start. You may want to start with something close to the dog's previous name and use the old name first, quickly followed by the new name. Then switch to new first and then old name, and then phase out the old name entirely.

If the dog's background has been so horrible that quakes when he hears his name, just change it immediately and remember to associate it with only good things. Use his name and toss a treat his way but not directly at him. Don't frighten him because he's had a lifetime of fear. Always call him to you to pat and praise him and give him a small treat. You never want to call any dog to you for punishment or to yell at him. Always make the association positive and loving.

Remember to be patient with your new family member. It takes time to adjust to a new home, a new name, and feel secure. Positive training will help him make positive associations with his new home, his new family and his new life. Speak softly to him, tell him he's a good boy (or good girl) and set your dog up to do things that you can encourage. Mistakes happen. Don't yell at him, especially be careful to use the new name in positive, loving ways and don't rush your newcomer. Allow him to have some time get acquainted. He's going to expect to be yelled at for no reason that he understands, or punished, or left alone in the yard, or returned to the shelter. It takes time to build trust and that wonderful human-animal bond. A slow, steady start and a brand-new name will lead to a lifetime of wonderful experiences and a deep and satisfying human-animal bond for you and your dog.

Darlene Arden is a Certified Animal Behavior Consultant, a speaker, a learning facilitator, an award-winning writer, and the author of more than half a dozen pet books, including her dog behavior book Rover, Get Off Her Leg! You can find her online at www.darlenearden.com and on Red Room.

The Long Island Working Rottweilers ~ A Retrospective
By Steve Wolfson

In 1989, a group of Rottweiler enthusiasts and I were displeased with our local and national Rottweiler clubs indifference towards the working aspect of the breed. The emphasis for those clubs was on conformation, not performance. We wanted more than fulfillment in the conformation venue; we sought a Schutzhund/Performance orientation. To my surprise, our small group was not alone in our sentiments; we had many others in the Long Island, New York area that felt the same. We were committed to the idea of starting a working club dedicated to the performance aspect of the Rottweiler and initiated the Long Island Working Rottweilers. Our club had a starting roster of 50 dedicated members with me as president and Mike Prisco as training director.

At that time, the United States Rottweiler Club was offering the direction we were seeking, but was relatively unknown here on the east coast. So in 1990, when the USRC held its national show in Pennsylvania, hosted by the Berksiana Rottweiler Club, we eagerly attended.

To us, the Berksiana show was quite exciting and encompassed the working aspect we wanted to embrace. This European style show was quite different to what we were accustomed. All entries were critiqued and awarded a conformation rating by the judge. It had 300 entries, and I believe 20 entries for the ZTP! The judges chosen were from the ADRK, Kurt Lohnert and Juergen Wullf, both specialists in the Rottweiler.

The following year, my good friend Bill Alexander conducted the first American Rottweiler Verein national show on the east coast. That too had over 300 entries and about 10 entries for the Ztp. The judge for that show was retired ADRK judge George Erschinger. We also attended the first Housatonic Rottweiler Club sanctioning show in Connecticut with my good friend Dietrich Neumahr as president.

After attending those exhilarating shows, we were convinced that this was the right path to chose. We joined the USRC in 1992 and held our first sanctioning show that same year. The judges for our first club event were Volker Czechowski and Felicia Luburich. Not surprisingly, we had a super entry of 60 for our sanctioning show, which I believe is an outstanding entry for an opening event.

For our first USRC select event, we decided upon Carla Lensi as our judge. She had international recognition in the breed and was noted for her detailed judgments. This first show garnered 110 entries and was attended by over 300 spectators from the entire New York Metro area. To the Long Island Working Rottweilers credit, our other shows had on average 129 entries, aggressive spectatorship (in addition to the owners of the entries) and an average of 5 ZTP entries per show. In our 7 year membership with the USRC, and despite never hosting a national event, our club had approximately 900 entries pass through our portal, 30 ZTPs, 1 breed symposium and 2 conformation seminars.

In 1998, we conducted a double event we were very proud of, How to Judge the Rottweiler in Conformation and Gait, and the USRC North East Regional Sieger Show. The lecture was conducted by Carla Lensi, our judge for the regional show, and was held at the Marriott hotel. It was an educational super event. The lecture included breakfast and lunch. It was accredited by the USRC (for those that chose to become a conformation judge) and attended by 50 people! The show was noteworthy. Although it was adjudicated by our one judge, Carla Lensi, it had a spectacular entry of 167 with spectators three people thick around the ring! Despite it not being a national, it had a generous entry in the working dog classes, 12 working dogs and 10 working bitches, and drew entries from Canada, the entire Eastern Seaboard, the Southeast and California. A great thank you must go to the sponsor for all our shows: the Iams Co. Their generosity and financial help made all of our shows and events successful.

There were many reasons for the success for our events and conformation shows. For one, they had drama and excitement. The winners were not predictable. If you won, or placed it was on the merits of your dog; the shows contained absolutely no politics! Secondly, they ran on time and were conducted in an orderly manner with strong supervision from the club. Thirdly, all our events were profitable without extracting additional unnecessary money from the participants. We went to great lengths to make all feel they had an honest chance at winning and would want to come back to enjoy the competition the following year. Additionally, the ring was the right size for shows of this style, 35 meters by 50 meters. There was no crowding. All handlers had ample space to move about and present their dogs. The judge also had ample perspective to assess the dogs locomotion. We also strongly believed that our events should contain a venue to learn and grow in our knowledge about the Rottweiler. Therefore, we held numerous seminars and a symposium. Even though it is no longer a club, the Long Island Working Rottweilers maintains a respectable record and reputation to this day!

Included in this retrospective are photos taken by the late Doug Loving from those great shows. These photos contain friends and people, past and present. All, in their own way, had an influence on our breed here in the US. Photos are numbered below each picture. Corresponding explanations are at the end of this article.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

1.Jane Hobson, Gabrielle Wodak
2.Gary Ramis & friends, Gabrielle Wodak
3.The late Mark Schwartz, Gabrielle Wodak
4.Lynne Panno, Roger Vanderyken
5.Kris Boucher, Roger Vanderyken
6.Frank Romano, Gabrielle Wodak
7.G&M Schneider, Lori Rizzitano, Roger Vanderyken 
8. The late Joe Weber, Roger Vanderyken
9. Mike & Mimi Prisco, Roger Vanderyken
10. Dietrich Neumahr, Roger Vanderyken
11. Bill Alexander, Merillio Duran, Roger Vanderyken
12. Ed Dupont, Dr. Otto Schimpf
13. Joe Allegrini, Dr. Otto Schimpf
14. John Dubarton, Dr. Otto Schimpf

AVMA opposes cosmetic ear cropping, tail docking of dogs
By R. Scott Nolen

The AVMA is calling on dog breed organizations to remove ear cropping and tail docking from their standards. The AVMA opposes ear cropping and tail docking of dogs when performed for cosmetic reasons and calls on breed organizations to remove mention of the procedures from their standards. The Association's Executive Board approved the revised AVMA Policy on Ear Cropping and Tail Docking of Dogs, Nov. 14. The statement reads: EAR CROPPING AND TAIL DOCKING OF DOGS The AVMA opposes ear cropping and tail docking of dogs when done solely for cosmetic purposes. The AVMA encourages the elimination of ear cropping and tail docking from breed standards. The former policy, approved by the AVMA House of Delegates in 1999, pointed out that cosmetic ear cropping and tail docking afford no benefits for animal patients, and advised veterinarians that they should warn clients about related, inherent risks of anesthesia, blood loss, and infection. The AVMA Animal Welfare Committee recommended the revised policy, which makes the policy of the Association consistent with those of the American Animal Hospital Association and the Canadian VMA. The committee explained to the Executive Board in the recommendation's background that there is little scientific evidence that the cosmetic procedures of ear cropping and tail docking convey benefits for dogs. Prior to the vote, Executive Board member Dr. Larry G. Dee of District IV spoke in favor of the revised policy. "Leaders take risks, and there's a risk in approving this policy, but it's a risk worth taking," observed Dr. Dee, a small animal practitioner from Hollywood, Fla. No board member spoke against the proposal. The American Kennel Club said labeling the procedures as cosmetic is a "severe mischaracterization that connotes a lack of respect and knowledge of history and the function of purebred dogs." Tail docking of dogs, with some exceptions for working breeds, is banned in the United Kingdom, as is ear cropping. Australia and much of Europe prohibit both procedures. In the United States, Maine has prohibited ear cropping. "Because the AVMA is an organization that has determined it will create animal welfare policies based on science, committee members believe there is no reasonable basis on which to continue support for these procedures being performed for cosmetic reasons," stated the Animal Welfare Committee in the background of its recommendation. Another reason Dr. Dee cited for approving the revised policy is the growing number of veterinary students uncomfortable with what they see as needlessly painful surgeries. Student AVMA President Emi Eaton, who was present at the board meeting, agreed. "The veterinary profession has been evolving, and many of the younger student body are behind ear cropping and tail docking only for medical reasons," Eaton, a fourth-year student at the University of Illinois, said later. R. Scott Nolen Read the AVMA press release about the policy on the Association's Web site at http://www.avma.org/press/releases/081126_earcrop_taildock.asp.

Review of the 2008 NERF Seiger Show
by Karen Billings

Our Seiger Show was a hit this year on October 4th & 5th, 2008. We opened our show with the Pledge of Allegiance recited by Mirabelle, Johanna & Megan, followed by the Star Spangled Banner sung by 10 year old Megan Messina.

Once again we had lovely weather, warm enough for the humans, but cool enough for our Rottweilers. Bruce unloaded his truck with our supplies from our NERF shed early in the morning and the tent was erected with the expertise of Barnum & Bailey crew, and the ring set up. It was our 4th Seiger show and we had 80 entries, a good count considering the expense of gas and hotels during these days that we are tightening our belts. We had many Owners & Dogs come from other states, and again our friends from Canada, whom have supported 
us every year. 

Once again we had a good turn out of helpers from our membership. We also had non-member volunteers. Steve Wolfson loaned us his sound system and head phones, it was a lot easier for the judge to announce her critiques. Steve gave an informative power point presentation at our judges dinner. Our Judge was Cathy Thompson who managed to stay on her feet for two long days, and do a great job of critiquing.

Noreen Ruscito did all the typing for both days and proof read all critiques herself, for which we are most grateful. She volunteered for next year also. Cheryl was our chief Steward and kept our ring running in perfect precision. Roberta took in all the entries and entered them in the Computer and also completed the catalogue along with Margaret and her typing skills. Whew! that's a lot of work. Scotti Ferguson & Pamela Clement took care of our Ways & Means table and sold tickets for our raffle.

Margaret and Maureen did a great job choosing the trophies. They were lovely and stylish. Let us not forget the unbelievable Hospitality Bags. Maureen puts together the best gifts and goodies which every entrant looks forward to receiving. Margaret and her sister made sure that all entrants had their armbands and were recorded. Tracy Benson was our photographer and did an outstanding job of getting pictures of every dog and formatted them on a CD. Each dog has at the least three poses. I suggest purchasing a CD, and you will have a nice collection of Rottweilers to observe. We had our Rottweiler Rescue booths. Old friends and long time members, Pete & Leslie Maddocks visited, as did Jennie Burkhardt. What would our show be without food. Our chefs George & Jay had all the cooking under control, and cooked to perfection.

We are already starting to plan our next years Show. We already have pledges for donations, Will you pledge a donation and volunteer a couple hours of your time???. 

Honoring the best darn Rottweiler in Oakley
By Steve Crump

Buster the pound hound finally got his place in the sun ...

The Rottweiler and his best friend, Mercedes Bedke of Oakley, were featured on cable TV's Animal Planet on Saturday as part of a segment of "Dogs 101" about Rotties ...

Buster was adopted by Mercedes' grandparents soon after they adopted the then 8-year-old girl ...

"We (thought) get her a puppy, but no puppies come available so we got a call from the animal shelter about Buster and went and picked him up and him and her bonded ... I mean he does not leave her," Phyllis Bedke, Mercedes' grandmother, told Boise's KTVB in May 2006 ...

Mercedes was riding her horse, BJ, when the animal shied away from a fence, throwing the girl into it ...

Buster to the rescue ...

He ran to the farmhouse, barking wildly, and led Mercedes' grandparents to the badly injured girl ...

"I come back out to call her for lunch and Mercedes was gone and Buster was at the door of the house and I knew something then was really wrong," Phyllis said ...

"My dad called me and said, you need to call 911, she is hurt bad and she's unconscious," Phyllis said ...

Mercedes suffered serious head trauma, and she was airlifted to Primary Children's Hospital in Salt Lake City ...

Yet she was back home in Oakley within two weeks ... Two years on, she's doing fine ....

And Buster? ... Well, he's not going back to the pound, according to the Animal Planet report ...

"He's got a spot with us forever," Phyllis said.

Mandatory Spay / Neuter
Another form of BSL
By Alex Wisienski

We all know there is an overpopulation of dogs and cats . There is a rising number of strays and shelters across the nation are busier than ever. Many of these pets come from puppy mills and backyard breeders that have no concern for the health or quality of the animals they sell. Many dont even know what a standard is. Knowing this is a problem I believe mandatory laws for spay and neutering will not stop these people and will not end the problem with strays overcrowding shelters and certainly not make it safer for citizens from being bit. Unscrupulous owners and puppy mills will pay the fee for the required in-tact animal permit and continue to make a profit while the quality breeder who pays close attention to health, temperament and breed standards will be burdened by the fees and eventually cease trying. To these people it is a very expensive hobby because they love their breed and strive to maintain perfection. When the hobby becomes too costly they will be forced to stop. Meanwhile the profiteers will continue with their inferior dogs. 

Mandatory spay/neutering is a rush to action and only a quick fix remedy without thinking of the big picture. The big picture is the impact it will have on ALL domestic pets for the entire future of domestic petsand humanity. Think of a future with scroungey sickly mutant pets from puppy mills. Or better yet, think of a future with no domestic pets at all when they reach the eventual point of extinction.

There are many ethical breeders that do not breed for profit. They breed for a healthy, premium quality animal and strive to improve the breed and compete in different venues of competition to show their hard work. Eventually these ethical breeders will be squeezed out of their passion and hobby because of costs and restrictions. I dont know of any ethical breeder that makes a profit. In the beginning it may not be too expensive but as time passes legislators will find it to be a good source of tax revenue so costs and restrictions will quickly increase.

Now, besides having lower quality animals from profiteers, think of the spayed/neutered animals that have not grown properly or to their fullest potential for health and structure. Scientific studies have found that dogs spay/neutered before fifteen months of age were smaller. 

Dogs spay/neutered before puberty more frequently have longer limbs, lighter bone structure, less bone density, narrow chests and narrow skulls. This abnormal growth frequently results in significant alterations in body proportions and weights. It may cause increased stresses on cranial cruciate ligaments. Studies showed a higher incidence of CCL rupture, hip dysplasia, and bone cancer. Females have a five time greater risk of hemangiosarcoma and males have 2.4 times greater risk. Studies also show increased undesirable sexual behaviors, noise phobias, fearful behavior and aggression.

Other health considerations include female urinary incontinence, urethral sphincter incontinence in males, and hyperthyroidism. Adverse reactions to vaccines and infectious diseases were also more common.
Having mentioned all the health risks, you now need to consider the higher expense for pet owners to care for their beloved pet. There is also a very real possibility of price gouging by veterinarians who will take advantage of those caring pet owners. Many veterinarians are already taking advantage of the animal rights movements by intimidating or embarrassing pet owners to pay for services not really necessary. 

Scientific Reference: Chris Zink DVM, PhD, DACVP 

Let's Rock 'N Roll
by Ms Dany Canino

Originally published in Showsight Magazine

"In the blockbuster movie, "Network", there was a famous line: "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore.

Well that's a line currently being used by breeders of a breed whose standard is being bounced around as if the judge is allowed to interpret it as they see fit. Add that to bringing in foreign judges whose country recognizes a different breed standard for most breeds. These judges come to the U.S. and seem to feel that it's OK to revert over to the standard of their country for this breed.

This recently happened in my own breed. Two foreigh judges awarded BOB over several top winning dogs. RELAX, that's not my complaint. My complaint is that on both days each foreign judge awarded BOB and BOS to dogs that are not as our standard says they should be. The standard for Rottweilers say" "Tail-Tail docked short, close to body, leaving one or two tail vertebrae. The set of the tail ismore important than length. Properly set, it gives an impression of elongation of topline; carried slightly above horizontal when the dog is excited or moving." I don't know how anyone can mistake or interpret the words to mean anything else. yet foreign judges, and unfortunately some American judges feel (they) have the right to change any breed standard to fit their own whim.

I once did a seminar on the breed and used pictures of undocked dogs whose heads I'd covered. Not one judge in the room identified the pictures as a Rottweiler. the attendees were shocked when I unveiled the whole dog.

I want foreign judges to have to attend a seminar for the breeds they will be judging before they are allowed to judge in this country. I know that it costs a lot to bring foreign judges here to judge. But, even beyond that fact, the kennel clubs that hire these people owe it to the exhibitors to be sure these judges know the Armerican standard that they're supposed to judge by. I refer to this not only for Rottweilers, I'm concerned about any breed wose standard calls for docking. If the standard says "docked" and the dog's tail is not docked, these dogs should be excused from the ring as they don't conform to the breed's standard. I've excused two Giants for this very reason.
I'm appalled that American judges would take it upon themselves to accept whatevery they choose in a standard and I'm angry that kennel clubs hire foreign judges and don't certify that these judges know our breed standards.

In the show that I refer to the foreign judges didn't even examine most of the dogs. They simply concentrated on the tailed exhibits. when the handlers in the ring brought this oversight up to the judges, the foreign judges said they didn't have to examine the dogs they weren't interested in. They told one very successful handler that she should learn the rules. Two other well known handlerswith two of the top winners of this breed held up their armbands and informed the judge that they were walking out. The judge didn't seem to care.

I was also surprised that the Working group judges didn't excuse either of these dogs. I wouldn't care if it was at the breed lever or group or, (God forbid) the BIS level. A dog who defies the breed standard needs to have a consequence.

When any American judge goes to a foreign country to judge it is understood that you follow the standard of the breeds you're doing for that country.

I hate it when these glitches happen. I am mad as hell because I don't like anything that makes it hard for me to "Rock "N Roll".

The Truth be Known
By Linda D. Witouski
September, 2008

Recently, I was confronted with a comment regarding the distribution of information regarding legislation to the dog loving populace that actually set my hair on fire. I'm sure it was intended to be quite innocent, however, with all of the information flowing across the internet highway, I found the comment to be most degrading to those that have been working in the trenches with legislation issues across the country, protecting those that won't protect themselves and felt it was a worthy comment to respond to. The simple comment that had me talking to myself for several hours was "The animal rights activists seem to be the only people out there with the resources to inform the public. Somebody needs to let the public know what's really going to happen to mans best friend!" So, for all of you out there that have this same thought in your mind, this is for you.

Nothing could be further from the truth. 

There are many of us, but not near enough, that have been preaching, writing articles, educating and literally begging for people to see what is going on around them, since the early 80's! The onslaught of information has been escalating over the years and only recently, has anyone decided to actually pay attention. Kennel Clubs across the country have and continue to use the media and the internet to disseminate information - organizations hold seminars regarding the issues confronting the dog loving populace - the AKC sends out alerts, but not near as often as other groups that work in the legislation trenches. Those alerts are non stop, daily and up to date. The internet is agog with information. There has never been a withholding of information or warnings - ever. It isn't the lack of information from our side - it's the apathy of the people who refuse to believe that the possibility of the demise of dog showing, breeding, and ownership could possibly exist. It's those people that, when legislation is mentioned, respond with, "I don't get involved in that." or "I don't have time for that and it will never pass anyway." Those people that say, "I'm sure somebody else is taking care of it." "That could never happen here," are only kidding themselves and in all actuality, are assisting in endangering their passion and sport as a whole. The worst response being, "I don't believe any of that stuff" clearly indicates that people are not taking advantage of the information available to them and these people who simply refuse to believe or get involved, are a large part of the problem. It's ironic that those very same people who don't have time - seem to have time to be on the computer in some chat group, discussing where the majors could be, or how many dogs they finished so far this year, or how many champion get their dogs have produced, and even go so far as talking about some other breeder in their breed, (especially if it's some rumor) but, they don't have time to take an interest in something that will eliminate all of the discussions on those chat groups? All of that - "stuff" - won't matter if everybody doesn't take the time to get involved in the movement to save their passion and sport - to save their right of choice - to save their dogs.

Laying the cards out on the table and holding nothing back

It's the inability of the dog people to work with others who share the same feelings, whether they are a hobby breeder or a hi volume breeder. It's the attitude and elitism that keeps those who share the concern to "save our rights" from working together on issues that could save our dogs, rights and our sport. It's the refusal to set aside issues of husbandry, breeding practices and selfishness that will cause the demise of the very sport that people are so passionate about. It's the constant use of animal rights phrases and descriptions such as "puppy miller" & "back yard breeder", names that were coined by the animal rightists to use against us, yet our own people use those same animal rights names for those who are their fellow breeders ! The animal rights crowd loves the fact that the dog owning, showing, breeding fancy can't seem to live in peace and harmony - it's one of their greatest weapons, created for just the purpose it seems to serve. How many times have we seen a fellow dog owner become engaged in problems, whether it is too many dogs or too many litters and need assistance (for a variety of reasons such as age, health, loss of job, confiscations, et al) yet, people, and people in the very same breed, don't bother to help - in fact, they sit and talk about it and refer to those people using animal rights terms and have even created their own AR term of "show millers". We're supposed to help each other, not assist in running our fellow dog owners and breeders down. You may not agree with 
something they do or the way they do it, but they are still our fellow breeders and if they need help, in order to preserve our OWN integrity and rights, we should help as much as we can (and keep quiet about it) - but people don't. The issue (and story) becomes compounded, (to the delight of the rightists) by spreading it further. They'd rather agree with those that are fully intending to get to your dogs at a later date, rather than help the poor soul whose dogs need help. We may not agree with their practices, but that is something to be considered later, once we have managed to solidify our position to continue to do what we do. All else will cease to exist if we don't start working together and put aside feelings.

People that know me, know I have been passionate about the subject for more years than they care to remember. and in those years, I have learned that there are those that simply choose to remain uninformed. It's not because the information is not available to them - they just don't care to become involved and don't believe it could happen to them or it "won't affect them". Others are concerned but don't know what to do or perhaps they really don't understand the severity of the problems, yet when offers are made to help educate people and assist them with truly understanding, nobody seems to want to participate. It is impossible to force people to be involved for they do have a right to make a choice...for now.

Relax - Somebody will tell you what to do 

It's unfortunate that the choice may come down to having animals....or not. Without the concern & assistance from the dog owning, dog loving, rights loving, freedom of choice loving, competitive people, (and I do mean each and every one) - rest assured, somebody will soon be relieving the burden of your inactivity in legislation issues for they will be telling you how many dogs you can have, if any, what kind, where to get them, how many times you can breed a dog, if at all, what vet to use, how many permits you will need to own/breed a dog, at what age your dog has to be spayed/neutered, the type of living arrangements required, what kind of records you must have and who gets copies of them - the list will go on, making it impossible - monetarily, mentally and physically impossible - to consider owning any animal. How will you feel when somebody knocks at your door and tells you that you must "get rid" of all but 3 dogs - which ones will you choose to keep and how will you feel watching the others loaded into a truck dispatched for some shelter? How will you react to five or six people going through your home, inspecting every corner and crack, because somebody called in a complaint about your dogs? How much can you afford for citations, lawyers fees, shelter costs and how will you ever recuperate from the heartache? Forewarned is forearmed - sooner or later, somebody will be making your choices for you and when that happens, there is nobody to blame but yourself. The information and people to help you become involved are out there!

Supporting Legislation and AKC

I just returned from the AKC Delegate meeting and it's dismal. At this time last year, registrations were 1.5 million and currently, for this year, they are 750,000 and continuing on a downward spiral. The AKC has acknowledged that the future is becoming dim and the possibility of them remaining the reigning registry of the world may soon be history. Though that may not mean much to some of you, it should. If the AKC continues to lose ground, they will also lose face in other areas, including having "clout" regarding legislation. The word of AKC and AKC breeders will mean nothing to legislators or the general public and AKC pups will be worthless, right along with AKC dog shows, titles and awards. Although some profess that they don't want to be "thrown in the pile with those other breeders", it's ironic that because of apathy, you will become just what you dislike. The end of the sport, and your passion for same, will be visible on the horizon. The choice will have been made for you.

Dog people tend to be their own worst enemy and sadly, doing a good job of it. You still have the freedom to choose to make a difference. I, and all the others that have been working to protect all dog owners in this country, hope you'll make the right decision. 

The cards are on the table. Bet, Call, Raise or Fold - the choice is yours. 
Linda D. Witouski

Want to keep up with what's going on?
Visit the Monthly National Legislation Report
http://mnlreport.typepad.com/the_monthly_national_legi/

Man in Rottweiler Rescue Case Pleads Guilty
Updated: Wed Sep. 24, 2008 ctvtoronto.ca

The Toronto Humane Society officer at the center of a 2007 controversy over a Rottweiler dying in an SUV pronounced satisfaction after the dog's former owner pleaded guilty in court.

Tre Smith told reporters Wednesday that the individual pleaded guilty Wednesday to one count of animal cruelty and has been ordered to pay $3,500 to the humane society.

The man, who formally received a conditional discharge, will also be banned from owning any animal for a year and has formally relinquished ownership of Cyrus. The dog's foster family will now take permanent responsibility for Cyrus.

In a news release, the society said: "This precedent-setting judgment is the first criminal conviction under section 446.1C of the Criminal Code of Canada (did not provide adequate care)."

On July 31, 2007, Smith had broken into the man's vehicle to rescue Cyrus, who was dying from the high temperatures inside.

He struggled with the man, then handcuffed him to the vehicle while he rushed the critically ill dog to a veterinary hospital. The man later alleged that angry bystanders beat him.

"There's two things I needed to do that day -- Rescue a Rottweiler named Cyrus and save his life, and to protect myself and the good Samaritans who were helping me," Smith said.

Cyrus "was on death's door," he said. Without help from those bystanders, "we'd be dealing with the death of a dog, and not the rescue of a dog," he said.

The Toronto Humane Society can use the reimbursement money, given that it is funded almost entirely on donations from the public, he said. "Given that this $3,500 came directly out of our pockets, I'm glad we were able to recoup the costs incurred in the rescue and rehabilitation of the suspect's dog," Smith said.

People should consider this case as a warning to take animal protection seriously, he said.

Cinnamon and her twin brother, Moses, were rejected by their mother at birth.

"Instinctually the mother rejects them for a reason -- they don't just reject them," Noelle said. "We think there probably was something wrong with him that we didn't know about, so she rejected him."

Moses quit eating and died a week and a half ago, but Cinnamon continued to thrive. Tim, who owns Tim's Special Cut Meats, had gone to Twin Lakes to get a sheep and that is how he found Cinnamon and Moses. The owner asked him to find them a home.

"He was tiny compared to her," Tim said of Moses.

But the minute the pair arrived at the Branen home, their 170-pound, 5-year-old Rottweiler, J2, assumed the duty of Mr. Mom.

"He took them both right away," Noelle said. "As soon as we brought them home he instantly started cleaning them, licking them and nurturing them and loving on them -- they were snuggled up with him. They've been inseparable."

For the first couple of weeks Cinnamon slept in a kennel inside their home, and J2 slept outside the kennel, not moving an inch. Now, they are sleeping outside together. Wherever J2 goes, Cinnamon follows and vice-versa.

"It was really cute, they were on the dirt piles in the back, and she would run up and down the dirt piles because she's twice as fast as he is, because he's a little heavy in the mid-section," Tim said.

Noelle said it's common for blackbelly sheep babies to climb on their mother's back and paw at them, which Cinnamon does to J2, who doesn't seem to mind. She said he has done everything that a mother would have done.

The Branens' neighbors are in awe, as are their friends.

"I can't believe this," said their friend Donna Wallace. "I was thinking the attraction is the coloring."

While J2 is black with cinnamon colored accents, Cinnamon is -- well, cinnamon, with black accents. They do indeed look related.

Noelle said J2 has never been a dominant dog and has always been a nurturer. Right now, Cinnamon is still being bottle-fed by Noelle, but they are introducing starter feed.

"She just got her teeth," Noelle said. "Here in the next week or so she should be able to eat food."

With teeth, comes chewing. Cinnamon is starting to chew on their couch, electrical cords, paper -- you name it. Noelle said it's like having a precocious toddler in the house.

"We're starting to do more outside," Noelle said.

The couple have four children in their combined family, Hannah, 8, Jaylen, 8, Jack 6, and Cassidy also 6. The kids are ecstatic with the new addition to the family. The family cat, Barnum, who is 17, is not real happy about any part of it.

Too bad for the cat, because Cinnamon is now part of the family and isn't going anywhere, Noelle said.

Lincoln Rottweiler and trainer claim Champion Tracker title
By JEFF KORBELIK / Lincoln Journal Star
Tuesday, Jul 08, 2008

Deuce was at deaths door.

Dogs, like people, are susceptible to irritable bowel syndrome, and Deuce came down with it in February.

It took its toll.

Norm Tucker with Deuce, a 5-year-old Rottweiler. Tucker and Deuce recently earned a Champion Tracker designation, the first team from Nebraska to do so. (William Lauer)

The 5-year-old Rottweiler, once ranked among the top 10 show Rotts in the country, was a mere shadow of himself. His skull became pronounced, and his ribs showed from losing 40 pounds. He had no energy, and almost no life. His owner, Cyndy Roggenkamp of Denton, took him to Kansas City, Mo., to see a specialist. The news wasnt good. They basically told me to change his diet again, and if it didnt work to prepare myself to lose him, she said. She relayed the prognosis to Norm Tucker. Roggenkamp owns Deuce, but Tucker of Lincoln has built a bond with the dog. Deuce was bred by Roggenkamp and Norms wife, Jayne. Cyndy always says,  I own Deuce, but hes your dog, Tucker said. Thats because Tucker has spent hours upon hours training Deuce to track, taking him to participate in American Kennel Club tracking events around the country. In February 2005, Deuce and Tucker earned Tracking Dog (TD) certification, a basic AKC tracking level, on their first attempt. Two months later, the pair completed Tracking Dog Excellent (TDX), a more advanced level, also on their first try. The duo was working on Variable Surface Training (VST) considered the most difficult level of tracking when Deuce went down sick. According to the AKC Web site, fewer than 100 dogs have achieved a VST title since 1995.

Tracking definitions A Champion Tracker (CT) title is awarded to a dog that has successfully completed all three tracking titles (TD, TDX and VST). Heres a rundown of three: Tracking Dog (TD): A dog earns a TD by following a track 440 to 500 yards long with three to five changes of direction. The track is laid by a human and is aged 30 minutes to two hours before the dog begins scenting. The goal is to use the scented track to locate an article left at the end of the trail by the tracklayer. The owner follows the dog on a long leash and can encourage the dog during the tracking test. Tracking Dog Excellent (TDX): The TDX is earned by following an older track (three to five hours) that is also longer (800 to 1,000 yards) and has five to seven directional changes. It also has the challenge of human cross tracks. Variable Surface Tracking (VST): In the real world, dogs track through urban settings, as well as through wilderness. A VST dog has demonstrated this ability by following a three- to five-hour-old track that may take it down a street, through a building and other areas devoid of vegetation. - American Kennel Club

Even more rare is earning a Champion Tracker title, which goes to teams that have passed all three tests (TD, TDX, VST).

Dian Quist Sulek, training director at Kenl Inn in Lincoln, said fewer than 10 percent of tracking teams reach this level.

Its a really big deal, she said. You have to have all three, and the toughest test is the VST.

She should know. Quist Sulek has a dog that has its TD and TDX titles, but has failed in 12 attempts on VST courses.

 My dog has lots of tracking skills, she said. Its just a matter of being on the right track on the right day.

Well, you can guess where this story is heading.

The Tuckers took in the ailing Deuce, changed his diet and watched the Rottweiler slowly put on weight. The dogs attitude also began to change.

I played with him, and he perked up, Tucker said.

Then Tucker put down a tracking course near his house, just to see if Deuce was up for it.

I talked to him while he was in his crate, and he started to whine, Tucker said. He knew he was ready to do something.

The dog did it, sniffing and zipping around the course until he found what he was supposed to find.

He was a happy camper again, Tucker said. He had put weight on. He had just really lit up. He had come back from the brink.

So much so, Tucker entered him in a VST event three weeks ago in DeKalb, Ill. Tucker didnt expect much. The duo had failed in 10 or so previous VST events, and Deuce still wasnt 100 percent.

As Tucker said, the planets and stars seemed to align on this spring day.

Deuce and his trainer took the course and nailed it.

I thought a couple of times he was going in the wrong direction, but I let him stick to his guns, Tucker said.

Deuce, Tucker said, knew he had done something pretty cool.

He carried the article (a plastic Tupperware lid) all the way back to the car, the trainer said. I dumped a couple of bottles of water on him and played frisbee with him.

Afterward, the pair was awarded the Champion Tracker title, becoming the first team from Nebraska to achieve the honor.

Just amazing, Tucker said, especially since he was just one vet phone call away from being put down.

Reach Jeff Korbelik at 473-7213 or jkorbelik@journalstar.com.

ASPCA Success Story of the Week: Sweeter Than Honey
Date: July 4, 2008

While out for a Saturday drive with her two dogs, Janice Ledbetter of Livingston, TN, spotted a young Rottweiler on the side of a busy highway. The canine had scars on her face and appeared to be starving and crippled in one leg. Remembers Janice, I took my dogs home and immediately brought the Rottweiler some food.

Janice approached cautiously, but very quickly relaxedthe pooch came right over, allowing herself to be hugged. Now I am a grown woman, a mother and a grandmother, Janice says, but I stood right there on the side of the highway and cried just thinking about what this dog must have endured. She instinctively named the pooch Honey.

When Janice returned to her car to get her phone, Honeyhungry as she wasignored the food, followed Janice and tried her best to crawl into the back seat. Seeing how much she savored that little bit of human interaction, remembers Janice, I gave her a boost into my car and took her home.

A visit to the vet revealed that Honey was about a year old and severely underweight. In addition, one leg was broken.

I started her on puppy chow and wet food and medication from the vet, says Janice. Three months later, Honey weighs over 90 pounds and bounces through the house. She and her best friend, my black Lab, Josie, tire themselves out wrestling together, says Janice, happily. And Honeys never met a human she didn't like. She wags her stubby little tail at anyone who comes in the door.

But theres one human who comes before all others. Honey rests in the shower while I brush my teeth and sleeps under my bed at night," says Janice. "She's become my shadow. I have no doubt shed give her life for me without hesitating.

Obedience Judge PREJUDICE Against Rottweilers
Subject: Obedience judge 
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008

Jim was entered in Novice B at the Bainbridge shows.

Paula Barras an obedience judge, excused Jim with Leo yesterday from the sits & downs in Novice B, he had a qualifying score up til then, they were in the ring getting ready for sits when the judge came over to Jim and said " I am excusing you from the ring BECAUSE I do not like the way your dog is looking at the little dog next to him" !!!! If he was sitting next to a Saint or great dane who would be the little dog!

Jim left the ring. The worst part of it is when I checked the score sheets at the superintendents tent It said and I quote " THE DOG SEEMS TO BE DANGEROUS" Mind you Leo has a CGC and he passed the ATTS test at CRC and he is a Champion. 

There was a flat coat retriever also looking around and sniffing others while they were getting ready for sits & downs but he was not excused. Then when they were called back in the ring for the ribbons the flat coat and a bulldog snarled & growled leaping at each other and what did the judge say "now boys no playing in my ring"!!!

Also 4 other Rottweiler breeders and owners were watching this.

We did as much as we could do to complain about this at the show but the AKC Rep said we have to file a complaint with AKC, which we plan on doing.

For now I would like to make everyone aware of this judge Paula Barras, be ware if you ask her to judge.

You may post this to CRC list and any other list that you want to make Rottweiler owners aware in my opinion that they are being discriminated against by this judge for the way they look at others in the ring.

~ Roxanna McGovern ~

Town outlaws five dog breeds!
From the BaltimoreSun.com

It's not a good time to be a dog in the Dakotas. 

Voters in Leola, South Dakota, have upheld a decision by the city council to make it illegal to possess pit bulls, bull mastiffs, Rottweilers, Doberman pinchers and German shepherds, and any dogs that are mix of those breeds. 

The banned breeds -- get this -- are exempted from the law if they help or are being trained to help people with disabilities. How generous. 

Mayor Dean Schock says the ordinance was passed due to concerns from people who walk and bike or whose children bike around town. Residents voted 103-27 last week to endorse the council's action. 

Meanhwhile, up in North Dakota, officials in the town of Kenmare, which approved a similar ban last month, decided the proposal needed more review. The town has a scheduled a special meeting tomorrow night to discuss it. 

The Kenmare council has been considering a ban on American Staffordshire terriers, Doberman Pinschers, Rottweilers, pit bulls or crosses of any of those breeds. Officials said the ordinance was drafted due to fears of vicious dogs, but some dog owners threatened to move because of it. 

For both these towns, I'd recommend doing a little homework on the issue. I'd recommend they meet my dog -- a combination of two "vicious" breeds -- but since that's not possible, maybe they could at least watch his movie, "Hey, Mister, What Kind of Dog is That." 

Then I'd recommend they stop here. And here. 

A dog's bloodlines don't make him dangerous. 

Stupid humans do. 

And - From KXMC.com

LEOLA, S.D. (AP) Leola voters have approved the city council's decision making it illegal to possess pit bulls, bull mastiffs, Rottweilers, Doberman pinchers and German shepherds. 

The vote this past week was 103-27 to endorse the council's action. Not only is it illegal to possess the breeds. It's also illegal to have crossbreeds of them. 

The new city ordinance also limits to two the number of any breed of dogs anyone can possess. 

It has an exception for people who raise and sell dogs. Also, the banned breeds are allowed if they help or are being trained to help people with disabilities. 

Mayor Dean Schock says the ordinance was passed due to concerns from people who walk and bike or whose children bike around town. 

When they came for the Pit Bulls, 
I remained silent; 
Surely these dogs deserved death! 

When they banned the Rottweilers, 
I remained silent; 
Who needs these dogs? 

When they came for the Guardian breeds, 
I did not speak out; 
My dog was not one of these. 

When they came for the large dogs, 
I remained silent; 
My dog was small. 

When they came for all dogs, 
there was no one left to fight with me. 

~ Matrix adapted from Niemller

Deja Vu 'nicest Rottweiler in world'
By Geoff Johnson - DN Staff Writer
May 24, 2008
From Red Bluff Daily News

She traveled across the United States four times on 17 planes, becoming such a regular on United that she was allowed to fly free.

At the peak of her career, she could track a man for more than a mile, at one time leading the search successfully for a drunk driver who crippled a deputy who had stepped out of his car to check another driver's ID.

Deja Vu worked for the Tehama County Sheriffs Department
for nine of her 12 years. Here she is seen wearing her traditional orange coat and Tehama County Submarine Veterans patch.

10 Tips On How To Photograph Your Dog
By: Dog Time

If youre the average dog lover, you think your pooch could out-pose even those silky Weimaraners in the picture books. But if youre the average amateur dog photographer, your photos never match the athleticism, humor, or outrageous cuteness of the real thing.

We asked pet photographer Mark Rogers, who immortalized our office dogs here, for his best tricks for taking high-quality dog pictureswithout getting into stuff like f-stops and shutter speed. Here are our favorites:

Let your dog get used to the camera.
The click and flash of a camera can rattle dogs at first, says Rogers. Let your dog give the camera a good sniff, then start casually shooting the surroundings (if youve got a film camera, you can do this before you load the film). Once your dogs gotten used to the camera and starts doing his own thing, begin taking pictures.

The idea is to keep things natural and relaxed. What not to do: Grab a ton of treats, abruptly shove the camera in your dogs face, and repeat, Mommys gonna take your picture! at high pitch.

Take lots of pictures.
This is the first rule of photography, no matter what the subject. The more you take, the better your chances of getting a few amazing shots. Always bring an extra battery, warns Rogers.

Turn off the flash.
Most amateur photographers do best with warm, natural sunlight. To avoid washed-out pictures, shoot in the mornings or evenings, on slightly overcast days, or in the shade on a bright day.

For indoor shots, youll probably need a flash. Youll get a more natural-looking shot if you use an off-camera flash and swivel it upward so the lights bouncing off the ceiling.

Get down on your dogs level.
If you stand over your dog and look down, every shot you take is going to look like everyone elses, says Rogers.

ONCE IS NOT ENOUGH
By Steve Wolfson

Standing outside the ring, I watched as the judge moved a large class of thirty exhibits. To me, the ring was too small and inadequate for a Rottweiler national specialty! As they moved with their handlers, most exhibits bunched upon each other resembling the rhythm of a giant accordion opening and closing; none could break out of a fast walk or switch gears into a trot. It seemed quite difficult for the judge to correctly evaluate this disorderly group for limping or preliminary assessments. Despite this obvious problem, neither the judge nor the club made any adjustments to ease the congestion. Was the small ring a management problem on the part of the club or simply an incomplete understanding in evaluating structure via locomotion? One can only guess.

  At all-breed shows, time is paramount and space is limited. A judge may have upwards of 175 exhibits to adjudicate in different rings, hand out ribbons, mark the book and be available for photos. Neither the club nor the judge has the luxury of examining each exhibit for the fine details of a breed.

  However, a specialty is the exception. There, the breed is exalted and exhibitors have high expectations from both the adjudicating official and the host club. Because of this, the bar is set high at a specialty since the details weigh heavy on all exhibitors minds. Time should be less of a factor and ring size should be large enough to thoroughly evaluate the exhibits while gaiting. Is this not why it is called a specialty? Nonetheless, the rings have grown smaller at many specialties preventing a complete evaluation of gait.

The Rottweiler is originally a drover/guard dog covering the most amount of ground with the least amount of effort. Therefore, his gait is evaluated in the trot. One should not dismiss the purpose of a breed; it is a fundamental aspect in all assessments of structure, temperament and locomotion.

Once Is Not Enough
Exhibits can easily muster the energy to gait in a small ring without taxing the musculoskeletal system, heart and lungs or temperament. Once around is sufficient. However, the bar and expectations should be set high at a specialty to separate the best of the best. To achieve these goals, we must change the dynamics with a large ring. Now, once is not enough!
This diagram shows the dimensions of a large ring that would be commensurate for a specialty. This size should be the minimum wherever possible. It is large enough to accommodate big classes, and is most importantly expansive enough for gaiting. It has several advantages over its smaller counterpart. This large ring is advantageous for the judge. The judge can step back far enough to gain a wide perspective. From such a vantage point, the judge has an improved view and can easily assess any exhibits change in gait, structure or temperament in comparison to others in the ring.


In the large ring, we can observe two aspects of the Rottweiler that a small one does not reveal
1. Hidden structural incongruities 
2. Temperament
    a. Willingness to Perform
    b. Endurance



1. Hidden Structural Incongruities

Standing still, many exhibits look great with good to superior breed type, good expression and great structure. Move them more than once around a large ring and the dynamics change. For example, the judge asks the handler to move his dog up and back then around the ring. For now, all appears wonderful and in the judges mind or book, a placement is made for the exhibit. The best six to ten dogs remain and all are asked to gait the full distance of the ring until asked to stop. Suddenly, in the second lap, the great looking exhibit that had all the right stuff starts to limp! What occurred? There are several possible scenarios. 

1. While gaiting, the exhibit encounters a low spot in the ground and twists a foot or shoulder. 
2. The exhibit is out of condition and its musculoskeletal structure is not ready for the rigors of 
extended running. 
3. Somewhere in the musculoskeletal structure, lies a covert weakness either in a
ligament or tendon, bone incongruity or muscle.

Obviously, a dog with structural problems such as, straight in the stifle, or very east-west in the front feet, etc., will break down quickly in a large ring after several laps. No surprise here! Most would expect this to occur in a dog with such a problem. In the small ring, save for an environmental twist of the ankle, #2, and # 3 do not occur since no physical stress was applied. However, in the large ring there is considerably more exertion. Under the pressure of exertion, a weakness is revealed.


2.Temperament

Because the Rottweiler is a working dog, there must be some applied mental pressure affecting the temperament of the dog. This is necessary to insure the breed maintains its ability to overcome and endure the rigors of work. It is what the Germans call Belastbarkeit. What we call, testing the dogs Mettle. This is the philosophical foundation for the sport of Schutzhund. An example of this is the gunshot test at a German shepherd sieger show. In the adult classes, the judge fires a starter pistol twice while the handlers stand with their entries. Any exhibit, which demonstrates nervousness, fear or viciousness as a result of the gunshot, is disqualified.
Whether the ring is large or small, there is a degree of stress and mental pressure exerted on an exhibit. Occasionally, we observe exhibits demonstrating extremes i.e. viciousness, shyness, fear, or the inability to stand for examination. Those dogs that display these extremes must be disqualified or excused. With more frequency, we observe dogs that fall in a grey area; they do not demonstrate the extremes, but a reluctance to be involved displayed by ears that are always back or hanging down. All these are obvious temperament flaws that are not acceptable for a working dog such as the Rottweiler. 

A. Willingness to Perform
In the large ring, we can observe the temperament characteristic of Willingness to Perform. Its best example is the exhibit that maintains a high energy attitude with ears forward, head held up in exuberant expression, lap after lap. This is the exhibit that appears to enjoy the challenge; it has Willingness to Perform. Conversely, we can observe exhibits that demonstrate reluctance to gait with exuberance in the first or second lap and must be cajoled by their handler. These exhibits do not possess a physical problem, but are handicapped by incorrect temperament.

B. Endurance
Endurance is a necessary component of the working dog. Two factors play a role in endurance.
1.Physical condition of the musculoskeletal system and heart and lung capacity.
2.Mental attitude 


1. Physical condition
All those that run, or are involved in a strenuous exercise program or body building, know it is impossible to maintain the physical exertion and stress demanded from the heart, lungs, and musculoskeletal system without being in good physical condition. The same is true for a dog. A Rottweiler that is in good physical condition should be able to endure a trot, without rest, in a large ring for at least 10 minutes. Because of, excess body weight, little or poor muscle mass and inferior heart and lung capacity, a great amount of todays exhibits are out of condition. For them, this would be difficult. 
2. Mental attitude.
Mental attitude (as part of general temperament) influences the dogs ability to endure and persevere. As laps increase, it becomes more strenuous and exhausting to continue. Despite a dog being in excellent physical condition, without correct mental attitude, it will shut down or run out of gas early in the competition. The dog with drive, when confronted with resistance or difficulty, will continue. The one without drive will give up.

Caveat

There are two things that affect even the best conditioned Rottweiler, even those possessing an exemplary temperament heat and humidity!
Because the muzzle on the Rottweiler is short and the coat is black, heat and humidity have a particularly debilitating effect. Other breeds do not have this problem like the Rottweiler. As the temperature rises and the humidity increases, clubs, judges and owners must take such factors into consideration when competing. Surely, the well conditioned dog with exemplary temperament can cope with these factors but there is a point where high temperature and humidity will take its toll. One must be careful!

In conclusion, many variables affect the success of a specialty dog show i.e., the location, adjudicating official, the management of the show, the time of the year, the weather, and attention to details. Some things are in our control, some are not. When the ring size is small, it sends a message that the judgment of the full spectrum of locomotion will be incomplete. We should demand more from hosting clubs than just providing a place to exhibit our dogs. At a specialty, we want to acknowledge the details of our breed. With correct breed type and the ability to sustain the rigors of the large ring, such are the Rottweilers that should be acknowledged and selected the Best of the Best!


Note: Thanks to Kreg Zimmerman for help in editing.

Fight BSL, It's a Matter of Survival
By Alex Wisienski

Our Rottweilers are second only to Pit Bulls on the list of dangerous dogs. EVERY owner should do something to protect their breed. 

There are already 75 breeds of dogs that are banned or restricted in cities across the United States. Breeds that include the Pug, Golden Retriever, and Labrador Retriever. No breed is safe from BSL. Just because a breed is not mentioned in a proposed bill, it doesn't mean it can't be added at a lower municipal level. 

Let the world know that just because we have a working breed and do Schutzhund or other controlled bitework, it doesn't mean our dogs are mean or vicious. Remind people every chance you get that bad owners are the cause of the dog problems we hear about. If someone sees a movie or a photo of dogs snarling or doing bitework and asks if our dogs are like that, let them know its only a movie or photo for advertising a product. Let them know that it doesn't mean the dogs are really mean. Take advantage of every opportunity to educate every person no matter how young or how old. If they are listening, educate them. Too many people are believing that BSL is the best thing to protect them and make for a safer community. The reason is because there are many news reports on dog bites and not enough information from responsible owners and breed clubs. Remember the old adage, the squeakiest wheel gets the grease. That means if you don't speak up, BSL will win and our dogs will be the biggest losers. When someone asks your opinion, or tries to tell you BSL is good, let them have it. 

• BSL WILL NOT stop dog bites or maulings until ALL dogs are banned or extinct. 

• BSL provides a false sense of security. 

• BSL DOES NOT stop or punish bad owners. They will just get another breed or buy a gun.

• BSL will increase the number of surrendered dogs to shelters and the euthanasia of healthy sound dogs. 

• BSL will force responsible owners to surrender or euthanize their beloved pet. 

A New Jersey legislator introduced a new bill in the Assembly. It is A3401 and it prohibits certain breeding and selling of dogs and cats. YES, cats too. It defines a Breeding Facility as any building or area whether outdoor or indoor, in which more than one cat or dog is housed. The key word here is `any'. This N.J. bill has a lot of support because people don't see between the lines. It appears to be a perfect bill to control puppy mills, which it would, but it is very vague and can be interpreted differently at lower municipalities. It would add a tremendous burden to responsible multi pet owners that are not mills. This too is BSL. BSL is real and it is a major threat to domestic pets as we now know them and a threat to our right to own and care for them. 

BSL and other breed ban policies will only legalize extinction. They fail to keep children and communities safe. Bad owners and criminals will continue to reek havoc in communities. BSL only punishes the good dogs and good owners. 

The average citizen needs to hear our side of the argument. They need to be educated. Educated people know that dogs are not the problem, bad owners are. 

I recommend that EVERY Rottweiler owner that has a website post BSL information and links to BSL information on their websites. It is a matter of urgence to get the message out. It is the responsibility of EVERY Rottweiler owner to do their part to protect our breed. Posting BSL information on your website won't take long and it won't cost anything either. That's the least you can do.

CAUTION - CHANGING A BREED STANDARD
By Patricia (Pat) H. Gilbert

If you open any Breed Standard to small changes, everyone has an agenda and big or inadvertent changes occur. We are working with a half dozen Parent Clubs on changes to their breed Standards that have this problem. The Havanese people are seriously close to splitting a relatively new AKC breed. Why? Members don't like each other and the breed has coat issues.

Standards are written by and for people who know dogs and their breed. They are a blueprint with room for individual interpretation and do not need to spell out everything. Basic anatomy is assumed. Four legs are not really mentioned in any Standard but as a judge show me a three legged dog and see what happens. 

The Afghan Hound breed is in great shape because the Afghan Hound Club of America (AHCA) left the Standard alone. It is untouched since 1948. It is not archaic. It is in "memory of ages past". It tells me the world each time I read it. Yes, there are traditions and additional nuances in the breed not spelled out specifically. It involves knowing the breed. It involves study.

Better to educate the public, owners, handlers, breeders and the judges. The AKC is not responsible for breed education. The Parent Clubs are responsible for breed education. 

The AHCA does have excellent programs for breeder's education, and judge's education. Ed and I presented The Heritage of the Afghan Hound in MN a few years ago at the National. We discussed mandarins, monkey whiskers, scented, etc. We discussed the nuances of the breed. We have a CD of the expanded version for sale to benefit Afghan Hound Health and Rescue Efforts.

There are books on the breed such as The Complete Afghan Hound, by Constance Miller & E. M. Gilbert Jr. (out of print).

Go to the AHCA website and read the excellent material there. It is written by some of the most prestigious past and present Afghan Hound people. 

The people, the material, the videos, and the CD's are out there. You can lead the horse to water, but...today's horses act more like camels with no thirst for knowledge.

I cannot imagine getting involved in owning or showing or worse judging a breed without study. Yet many believe, people do it every day and it is common. 

Yet some in the fancy really think the solution is to change a Standard for people who do not know what the words mean anyway. Change it for people who don't care enough to interpret the words? Change it for people who do not know basic anatomy? Change it for people who do not understand breed specific conformation or movement? NOOOOOO. Leave the Standard alone and educate the people. 

This is, as you can read, a hot point with me. Give them a copy of the Standard and then discuss the various points. Teach people how to read and interpret Standards. That is what Ed and I do at our seminars. 

Some advocate changing the Afghan Hound Standard to include allowances for the differences between puppies and adults. Some have stated: "The Standard doesn't differentiate between puppy and adults." Yet a reading of the Standard shows this statement to be untrue.

The AKC Afghan Hound Standard states: Coat - ...the saddle...hair is short and close, forming a smooth back in mature dogs...Fault - Lack of shorthaired saddle in mature dogs.

A study of the breed and semantics will show that a puppy is not a mature dog and therefore is not expected to have a saddle.

Education is the only change I want to see.

When it comes to breed Standards it is best not to open Pandoras box.

Courtesy of Ed & Pat Gilbert's K-9 Seminars.
Copyright 2008 / Web site: www.gilbertk9.com

SLEEPING WITH ROTTWEILERS
Dogs & Chit Chat by The Silver Haired Lady

Dog's Quick Action Deters Moose

Beware Holiday Hazards For Dogs
by Tracie Laliberte-Bailey /For The Sun Chronicle

Cat is Mans Best Friend
A Rushford plumber and his Rottweiler pitch in to help, comfort after flood
By Elena Grimm | Winona Daily News
RUSHFORD, Minn. You could say that Cat is mans best friend.

Recognizing, Preventing, and Handling Dog Aggression
Lia Felabhoe 
October 11, 2007 

A dog is an instinctively aggressive creature. In the wild, aggression came in very handy: dogs needed aggression to hunt, to defend themselves from other creatures, and to defend resources such as food, a place to sleep, and a mate. Selective breeding over the centuries has minimized and refined this trait significantly, but theres just no getting around it: dogs are physically capable of inflicting serious harm (just look at those teeth!) because thats how theyve survived and evolved. And Mother Nature is pretty wily its hard to counteract the power of instinct! 

But that doesnt mean that we, as dog lovers and owners, are entirely helpless when it comes to handling our dogs. Theres a lot that we can do to prevent aggression from rearing its ugly head in the first place and even if prevention hasnt been possible (for whatever reason), there are still steps that we can take to recognize and deal with it efficiently. 

- Different aggression types - 

There are several different types of canine aggression. The two most common ones are: 

- Aggression towards strangers 

- Aggression towards family members 

You may be wondering why were bothering categorizing this stuff: after all, aggression is aggression, and we want to turf it out NOW, not waste time with the details right? 

Well not quite. These two different types of aggression stem from very different causes, and require different types of treatment. 

- Aggression towards strangers - 

What is it? 

Its pretty easy to tell when a dogs nervy around strange people. Hes jumpy and on the alert: either he cant sit still and is constantly fidgeting, leaping at the smallest sound, and pacing around barking and whining; or hes very still indeed, sitting rock-steady in one place, staring hard at the object of his suspicions (a visitor, the mailman, someone approaching him on the street while hes tied up outside a store.) 

Why does it happen? 

Theres one major reason why a dog doesnt like strange people: hes never had the chance to get used to them. Remember, your dog relies 100% on you to broaden his horizons for him: without being taken on lots of outings to see the world and realize for himself, through consistent and positive experiences, that the unknown doesnt necessarily equal bad news for him, how can he realistically be expected to relax in an unfamiliar situation? 

What can I do about it? 

The process of accustoming your dog to the world and all the strange people (and animals) that it contains is called socialization. This is an incredibly important aspect of your dogs upbringing: in fact, its pretty hard to overemphasize just how important it is. Socializing your dog means exposing him from a young age (generally speaking, as soon as hes had his vaccinations) to a wide variety of new experiences, new people, and new animals. 

How does socialization prevent stranger aggression? 

When you socialize your dog, youre getting him to learn through experience that new sights and sounds are fun, not scary. 

Its not enough to expose an adult dog to a crowd of unfamiliar people and tell him to Settle down, Roxy, its OK he has to learn that its OK for himself. And he needs to do it from puppyhood for the lesson to sink in. 

The more types of people and animals he meets (babies, toddlers, teenagers, old people, men, women, people wearing uniforms, people wearing motorcycle helmets, people carrying umbrellas, etc) in a fun and relaxed context, the more at ease and happy and safe around strangers - hell be in general. 

How can I socialize my dog so that he doesnt develop a fear of strangers? 

Socializing your dog is pretty easy to do its more of a general effort than a specific training regimen. 

First of all, you should take him to puppy preschool. This is a generic term for a series of easy group-training classes for puppies (often performed at the vet clinic, which has the additional benefit of teaching your dog positive associations with the vet!). 

In a puppy preschool class, about ten or so puppy owners get together with a qualified trainer (often therell be at least two trainers present the more there are, the better, since it means you get more one-on-one time with a professional) and start teaching their puppies the basic obedience commands: sit, stay, and so on. 

Even though the obedience work is very helpful and is a great way to start your puppy on the road to being a trustworthy adult dog, really the best part of puppy preschool is the play sessions: several times throughout the class, the puppies are encouraged to run around off-leash and play amongst themselves. 

This is an ideal environment for them to learn good social skills: theres a whole bunch of unfamiliar dogs present (which teaches them how to interact with strange dogs), theres a whole bunch of unfamiliar people present (which teaches them that new faces are nothing to be afraid of), and the environment is safe and controlled (theres at least one certified trainer present to make sure that things dont get out of hand). 

Socialization doesnt just stop with puppy preschool, though. Its an ongoing effort throughout the life of your puppy and dog: he needs to be taken to a whole bunch of new places and environments. 

Remember not to overwhelm him: start off slow, and build up his tolerance gradually. 

- Aggression towards family members - 

There are two common reasons why a dog is aggressive towards members of his own human family: 

- Hes trying to defend something he thinks of as his from a perceived threat (you). 

This is known as resource guarding, and though it may sound innocuous, theres actually a lot more going on here than your dog simply trying to keep his kibble to himself. 


- Hes not comfortable with the treatment/handling hes getting from you or other members of the family. 

Whats resource guarding? 

Resource guarding is pretty common among dogs. The term refers to overly-possessive behavior on behalf of your dog: for instance, snarling at you if you approach him when hes eating, or giving you the eye (a flinty-eyed, direct stare) if you reach your hand out to take a toy away from him. 

All dogs can be possessive from time to time its in their natures. Sometimes theyre possessive over things with no conceivable value: inedible trash, balled up pieces of paper or tissue, old socks. More frequently, however, resource-guarding becomes an issue over items with a very real and understandable value: food and toys. 

Why does it happen? 

It all boils down to the issue of dominance. Let me take a moment to explain this concept: dogs are pack animals. This means that theyre used to a very structured environment: in a dog-pack, each individual animal is ranked in a hierarchy of position and power (or dominance) in relation to every other animal. Each animal is aware of the rank of every other animal, which means he knows specifically how to act in any given situation (whether to back down, whether to push the issue, whether to muscle in or not on somebody elses turf, etc etc). 

To your dog, the family environment is no different to the dog-pack environment. Your dog has ranked each member of the family, and has his own perception of where he ranks in that environment as well. 

This is where it gets interesting: if your dog perceives himself as higher up on the social totem-pole than other family members, hes going to get cheeky. If hes really got an overinflated sense of his own importance, hell start to act aggressively. 

Why? Because dominance and aggression are the exclusive rights of a superior-ranked animal. No underdog would ever show aggression or act dominantly to a higher-ranked animal (the consequences would be dire, and he knows it!) 

Resource guarding is a classic example of dominant behavior: only a higher-ranked dog (a dominant dog) would act aggressively in defense of resources. 

To put it plainly: if it was clear to your dog that he is not, in fact, the leader of the family, hed never even dream of trying to prevent you from taking his food or toys because a lower-ranking dog (him) will always go along with what the higher-ranking dogs (you and your family) say. 

So what can I do about it? The best treatment for dominant, aggressive behavior is consistent, frequent obedience work, which will underline your authority over your dog. Just two fifteen-minute sessions a day will make it perfectly clear to your dog that youre the boss, and that it pays to do what you say. 

You can make this fact clear to him by rewarding him (with treats and lavish praise) for obeying a command, and isolating him (putting him in time-out, either outside the house or in a room by himself) for misbehavior. 

- If youre not entirely confident doing this yourself, you may wish to consider enlisting the assistance of a qualified dog-trainer. 

- Brush up on your understanding of canine psychology and communication, so that you understand what hes trying to say this will help you to nip any dominant behaviors in the bud, and to communicate your own authority more effectively 

- Train regularly: keep obedience sessions short and productive (no more than fifteen minutes maybe two or three of these per day). 

Why doesnt my dog like to be handled? 

All dogs have different handling thresholds. Some dogs like lots of cuddles, and are perfectly content to be hugged, kissed, and have arms slung over their shoulders (this is the ultimate Im the boss gesture to a dog, which is why a lot of them wont tolerate it.) Others usually the ones not accustomed to a great deal of physical contact from a very young age arent comfortable with too much full-body contact and will get nervy and agitated if someone persists in trying to hug them. 

Another common cause of handling-induced aggression is a bad grooming experience: nail-clipping and bathing are the two common culprits. 

When you clip a dogs nails, its very easy to quick him that is, cut the blood vessel that runs inside the nail. This is extremely painful to a dog, and is a sure-fire way to cause a long-lasting aversion to those clippers. 

Being washed is something that a great many dogs have difficulty dealing with a lot of owners, when confronted with a wild-eyed, half-washed, upset dog, feel that in order to complete the wash they have to forcibly restrain him. This only adds to the dogs sense of panic, and reinforces his impression of a wash as something to be avoided at all costs if necessary, to defend himself from it with a display of teeth and hackles. 

Can I retrain him to enjoy being handled and groomed? 

In a word: yes. Its a lot easier if you start from a young age handle your puppy a lot, get him used to being touched and rubbed all over. Young dogs generally enjoy being handled its only older ones who havent had a lot of physical contact throughout their lives that sometimes find physical affection difficult to accept. 

Practice picking up his paws and touching them with the clipper; practice taking him into the bath (or outside, under the faucet whatever works for you, but warm water is much more pleasant for a dog than a freezing spray of ice-water!), and augment the process throughout with lots of praise and the occasional small treat. 

For an older dog that may already have had several unpleasant handling/grooming experiences, things are a little more difficult. You need to undo the damage already caused by those bad experiences, which you can do by taking things very slowly with an emphasis on keeping your dog calm. 

The instant he starts to show signs of stress, stop immediately and let him relax. Try to make the whole thing into a game: give him lots of praise, pats, and treats. 

Take things slowly. Dont push it too far: if you get nervous, stop. 

Dogs show aggression for a reason: theyre warning you to back off, or else! If your dog just cant seem to accept being groomed, no matter how much practice you put in, its best to hand the job over to the professionals. 

Your vet will clip his nails for you (make sure you tell him first that he gets aggressive when the clippers come out, so your vet can take the necessary precautions!). As far as washing and brushing goes, the dog-grooming business is a flourishing industry: for a small fee, you can get your dog washed, clipped, brushed, and whatever else you require by experienced professionals (again, make sure you tell them about your dogs reaction to the experience first!)

A Sensible Vicious Dog Law
From OutsidetheBeltway.com
Steve Verdon | Thursday, May 24, 2007

The town of New Bedford Massachusetts has come up with what is actually a good law in regards to dangerous/vicious dogs. Basically, the law is structured to focus on the deed, not the breed. That is, the law is geared to imposing penalties and restrictions on individual dogs that show signs of being dangerous/vicious.

It goes after the deeds of the dog, the temperament it is showing, said Mr. Maciel. Drafted by City Councilors Linda Morad and Jane Gonsalves along with Mr. Maciels office and various animal control groups, the ordinance avoids being breed-specific.

Instead, said Mr. Maciel, it allows animal control officers to judge a dogs aggressiveness and actions before slapping restrictions, requirements and increased possible penalties on owners who ignore the rules.

He said a dozen dogs are now on the dangerous and vicious list, and only three are pit bull mixes. The others include a boxer, three German shepherds, a Rottweiler, Labrador retriever, mini-pini (Doberman)-chihuahua mix and, unfortunately, a Boston terrier, the state dog, he said.

This is exactly the right approach. Any dog can be vicious and size and breed are at best questionable guides in that regard. Take for example the chihuahua. Most people think that is an okay dog to own because of its small size. Even a young child could probably handle a chihuahua. However, chihuahuas are some of the most animal aggressive and human aggressive dogs. They also tend to be rather excitable and their small size could make it easier for a small child to injure or hurt the dog. While the latter might look like a possible benefit in terms of the child dealing with an aggressive chihuahua it could also mean that children will be more likely to have problems with this type of dog. Will a chihuahua kill a child? No probably not, but still it could inflict a nasty bite and since children like to do things like cuddle with dogs, that could mean getting bitten on the face or some other part of the body besides the ankle. So in this case, size is not a good indicator as to danger the breed poses.

At the same time a larger dog like the labrador retriever tends to be a stable even tempered dog. This dog passes temperment testing at one of the highest rates (and if we go with breeds that have had more than 200 dogs tested it has perhaps the highest pass rate). But this dog is also a medium sized dog and around infants and toddlers even an accident could send the child to the ground, off a chair or bed leading to injury.

A large part of the problem with dangerous/vicious dogs is that people often do not know how to behave around dogs and make for irresponsible owners. Did you get a cute little puppy that you failed to get neutered, licensed and usually spends the majority of its time alone in the backyard? I dont care what breed you have, chances are your dog is more dangerous than the person who owns a rottweiler who has neutered his dog, licensed it, and the dog is well integrated into the family strutcture and well socialized around other people. Yet, most people would have the knee-jerk reaction of looking at the rottweiler as a death machine and the other dog as a lovable family pet.

Then there is the issue of training our children how to approach and deal with dogs. Dogs are ubiquitous in our society so it would be prudent for parents to periodically remind their children what do around dogs. Things like,

1: Never approach a loose/stray dog. 
2: Never surprise a dog. 
3: Always ask the owner for permission to pet the dog. 
4: Let the dog sniff you before you try to give a hug. 
5: Never surprise a dog (e.g. wake it up by running up to pet it) 
6: Never run from a stray dog.

If more owners would spay/neuter their dogs, make sure they had a secure dog run, kennel, crate or back yard, socialized their dogs (and to be sure this is a continuous process), and train them in basic obedience there would be far, far fewer dog bites and maulings.

And for Gods sake treat your dog like a dog. I hate it when I hear peopel say, They are babies, or I cant help it, I spoil them. Sorry, but you are a complete idiot. These are dogs and they should be treated as such. Trust me, the dog and you will be happier that way. It doesnt mean you cant love your dog, that you cant buy it treats, or even let the dog sleep in your bed or take it with you when you go on trips. What it means is you should establish yourself as the pack leader, you should be set rules and boundaries for your dog, and when you give a command it should listen and follow the command. And if necessary, you may have to give the dog a job, even if it is something as mundane as carrying some water bottles in a doggie backpack during your walks.

And if you arent up for doing all of the above, then dont get a dog. Get a cat, or even better get some goldfish. When you go out and get a dog you should be prepared for the commitments that such an action entails. Dogs are social/heirarchical creatures. They do well within the family and they languish and suffer outside of it. If you arent prepared to have a dog in your life, then you arent prepared to own a dog.

Still there are some bad parts to that article, IMO.

Dr. Dodman said any legislation ought to target breeders who purposely develop aggressive dogs. He cited the Doberman pinscher as one example of a dog that had a bad reputation, but has since had the aggressiveness removed through good breeding.

Karen Harght, co-owner along with Joan Hopkins of American Canine in Westport, concurred.

When I was a child, Doberman pinschers had a horrible reputation. They were very aggressive, like pit bulls were. Then they kind of fell out of favor. And over the course of the last three decades the aggressiveness has been bred out of them. Now I see a lot of Dobermans that are sweet as pie.

I dont think that aggressivness has been breed out of the doberman, my guess is that since the breed is no longer the fad breed the many of breeders are responsible/reputable breeders who view themselves as stewards of the breed. These breeders are careful in what dogs they breed. First theyll look at the overall health of the dog, then the temperment and only the best dogs with good marks in both areas will be bred. The rest will be spayed or neutered and placed as pets. Further, these breeders tend to be very rigorous when placing a dog. When the dog is in a fad phase every idiot with an unfixed dog looks to turn a quick buck through breeding their dog(s). They dont worry too much, if at all, about health, and temperment isnt even something they can judge. All dogs are placed with people unfixed and there are no conditions about taking the puppy back if things dont work out. In this situtation you get badly bred dogs, dogs that wind up on the streets because their owners abadon them or lose them, and you have a much larger population of that dog. Hence dog attacks by that breed increase and they show up in the paper and you have the new demon dog de jure. This has been seen time and time again. Dobermans were the bad dog. Then german shepherds, St. Bernards, and Rottweilers and now pit bulls.

On the other hand, she said, If I see an Akita, I turn around and go the other way.

While the Akita isnt a dog for your novice/first time dog owner this is just ridiculous. While there are quite a few dog bites every year (several million) there are tens of millions of dogs. And fatalities are even less frequent. Given this, the above attitude is emblematic of people simply not evaluating the risks correctly. If you get so nervous around an Akita that you head the other way, you probably should never go near a car, a pool, or take a bath or shower. Your risks of death/injury with all of these safe items probably far outstips any dangers posed by an Akita.

In New Bedford, Mr. Maciel said, the ordinance may require a succession of precautions to restrain and confine troublesome dogs, and fines for breaking the rules can be heavy, up to $600.

Bad dogs will be spayed or neutered and have a microchip implanted under the city ordinance, and annual licenses will cost more, along with the secure enclosures the city will require and inspect.

Preventing the dogs from reproducing is the most important component, he said. We dont want them breeding and the offspring having the temperament of the mother and the father, he said. That way our community becomes safer.

Somebody in the local government of New Bedford is guilty of having a brain.

AVOIDING HARM FROM DOGS
Properly trained, even aggressive breeds won't attack.
Experts say injuries can be avoided when animals understand their place.
From Freep.com (Detroit Free Press) ~ Detroit MI ~ 

September 15, 2007 
BY AMBER HUNT 
FREE PRESS STAFF WRITER 

ROTTWEILER NURSES ORPHAN KITTEN
By: Jessica Weinstein, wgrz reporter 
Updated: 8/22/2007

Halloween & Hounds

Halloween is for humans not dogs. Screaming, running, spooky children in masks make many dogs uncomfortable, nervous and frightened. <<<Not to mention igniting PREY DRIVE>> 

Halloween costumes are fun and are meant to disguise our normal appearance. Dogs do not understand this change in appearance and may become frightened. Costumes that change the way a person walks, stands, or their general appearance may cause a dog to react different then usual even with those they know. 

Keep in mind that children on Halloween night are excited and doing their best to be scary. This is not a fair or safe situation to put even the best of dogs in. Even the normally terrific tolerant family dog can find this night hard to handle. 

Along with costumes being frightening to a dog there are some that may become interesting too. Swords, tails and dangling things may be fun for an excited dog to chase and toddlers certainly won't appreciate that. 

Every child and every costume is a new opportunity for different reactions from the same dog. 

I recommend setting up your dog with their own private Halloween bash in a safe quiet spot with a yummy treat of their own. Here are some tips to help make this safe haven most comfortable. 

1.Stuff a food dispensing toy with yummy mush and freeze it until it is Halloween time. 

2.Use a fan or radio for white noise. Something consistent is best. 

3.Be sure the blinds are down or the dog is not watching kids coming and going by the window. This will only frustrate him and allow him to practice barking and carrying on at the window. 

Chocolate is toxic to dogs. Put candy in a safe spot. 

Many dogs are stolen, poisoned or injured by Halloween pranks. Keep your dog safe and sound inside your home. 

Be safe and aware and have fun! 

About The Author 
Jennifer Shryock, Canine behavior consultant
Owner of Family Paws -  www.familypaws.com 
U.S. Coordinator of Doggone Safe - www.doggonesafe.com 

Therapy Dog Comforts Boy with Cancer
by FOX 9s Scott Wasserman
June 18, 2007

Two strangers brought together by cancer developed a bond that would give a little boy battling the disease something to look forward to. FOX 9s Scott Wasserman has their story!

Chopper (owned by Pat Kinch) doing his job!

When enthusiasts decide to purchase a new puppy or a breeder selects breeding partners for their future litters, they draw conclusions and evaluate their choice from a narrow perspective using only a specific aspect of the breed as their criteria. For example, some breeders only seek to use the construction of the Rottweiler as their mark of excellence. They demand only the best angulated, the most correct fronts and rears as their guide for breeding partners omitting other important aspects that comprise the whole picture. Some only use health certifications as their guide. They will only breed or keep dogs that have attained all the necessary certifications such as OFA, heart and CERF clearances, dismissing from the formula, breed type, construction and gait. From a long-term breed viewpoint, this single-aspect criterion is myopic and disastrous. Is there a guide to facilitate a comprehensive approach to the breed without sacrificing one aspect for another? The answer is yes. 
Euclid, the Greek mathematician, stated in his axiom, the whole is equal to the sum of its parts. Despite this being of mathematical relevancy, we can apply this statement to help guide us in a more complete understanding and evaluation of the Rottweiler. By using a Rottweiler Pyramid, where each element of the Rottweiler is prioritized in a hierarchal order of importance, Breed Type, Temperament, Construction, Locomotion, one can view each part on its own merits. Once a thorough understanding of these related elements is achieved, a complete and balanced picture results. It should be the goal of every breeder to incorporate all of these aspects into a breeding program. 
(Note: For this essay, I have distilled the topics down to their basic, large block ideas. I also have omitted health clearances from the pyramid, since they are a prerequisite for breeding, showing and training. It would be foolish to pursue a show/sport career with a dog that possessed dysplasia or other serious health issues further than as a personal companion)

1.  Breed Type

Number one in the pyramid is Breed Type. The description of it comprises 85% of the standard, its major and defining aspect. Its correct understanding is the foundation of any breeding program, evaluation for judgments in the conformation ring and the first rung on the ladder for the complete understanding of the Rottweiler.
In this area, some prefer to take shortcuts by reinterpreting the standard and taking liberties with its translation, instead of traveling the more difficult path by reading and completely understanding its blueprint. Without a thorough and broad perspective about breed type (or any other segment of the standard), one can only build a house of understanding that is incomplete. This argument, that many do not understand or know what correct breed type is, can easily be proofed with the fine boned, narrow muzzles, pinhead, absence of masculinity exhibits we now encounter in the show ring and obviously on the street.
An excellent and easy test for knowledge of breed type is asking the simple question, What is Breed Type? Many have great difficulty with the answer. When asked this question exhibitors and owners have articulated breed type as excellent gait. Some say it is correct temperament. Yet others define it as performance on the working field. None are correct. Breed Type should be defined as the essence of characteristics that distinguishes it from others."(1) In simpler terms, it is the appearance of the breed, which separates it from others. Is that not what first attracts us to the Rottweiler?
In the show ring, where we should see only the best examples of type, save for a small percentage that is not, we see the lack of correct breed type abundantly demonstrated. Currently here in the states, many exhibits do not possess the minimum essentials in head and body type. In fact, many heads and bodies are at best, only sufficiently correct and do not possess the implied masculinity of the breed. The most defining aspect of correct breed type, the Rottweiler head, the breeds icon, should have great prominence. The standard devotes detail to its description with its Broad between the ears, broad muzzle at the base, moderate arch of the topskull, pronounced stop, zygomatic arch and specified 3 to 2 skull to muzzle ratio. In essence, the head is powerful, substantial and impressive. Yet, so many exhibits now possess 
the opposite of what is correct, a long, soft in appearance narrow muzzle, shallow zygomatic arch and stops. This creates a head type, which recedes in to the body having no prominence. The power and strength specified in the standard for the muzzles and topskull is not there; the heads are hound-like.
In correlation with the details of correct head type, are the details of correct body type. The standard specifies, "His bone and muscle mass must be sufficient to balance his frame, giving a compact and very powerful appearance." The standard is direct with its specifications on body type with the key words of compact, powerful and muscle mass. The bone should be ample in proportion to the size of the body, the muscles mass should be strong and well defined and the body length should appear to be short and compact. There should be not doubt in appearance concerning the amount of bone mass, muscle mass and compactness of the body. However, what we encounter are fine and spindly bones, long bodies, little to no muscle mass and definition. 
The underlying theme in the standard for the Rottweiler is masculinity. Correct breed type requires it. The standard does not specifically mention this word; it is implied. Even the bitches should possess power and substance without weakness. Softness, slight in build, refined, feminine are not words to use when describing or having a mental picture of the breed.

2.  Temperament

The second tier on the pyramid and essential aspect of the standard is temperament. Without correct temperament, all other aspects or traits, even if they are of superior quality, have little value! It is important to understand what correct temperament is and how to evaluate it. From the standard, The Rottweiler is basically a calm, confident, courageous dog A Rottweiler is self-confident and responds quietly and with a wait-and-see attitude to influences in his environment. He has an inherent desire to protect home and family, and is an intelligent dog of extreme hardness and adaptability with a strong willingness to work, making him especially suited as a companion, guardian and general all purpose dog. 
What is correct temperament? How can we recognize it? We must take our template from the standard. Ideally, he is a calm, confident, courageous dog of extreme hardness and adaptability with a strong willingness to work. Few Rottweilers fit the ideal of the standard, which can demonstrate all of its positives. More likely, they measure up or down in differing levels. Because he is working dog, we must test and evaluate these differing levels of temperament through his work.
Albeit, the show ring is largely popular here in the states and in the international community, many rely solely on a dogs behavior within the show ring as a demonstration of temperament. This is dangerous because it does not give us any keen insights to the complete spectrum of temperament; its main purpose is to evaluate conformation. Some would say that the show ring does give us a window into the dogs nature. However, exhibiting and gaiting in the conformation ring can only demonstrate the extreme problems in a dogs temperament, such as the inability to stand for an examination, shy, nervousness or viciousness. It has extremely limited value when assessing the complexity of temperament. 

The Germans use the term Belastbarkeit, a dogs capacity, whether high, medium or low, to sustain its drive, tractability and nerve under the conditions and pressures of work. In Germany, they place a high value in the dogs level of courage and its ability to deal with stress. There, the minimum test is the Zuchttauglichkeitsprufung (breed suitability test where the dog is tested for its courage and stress level); one cannot breed their Rottweiler unless it has passed the Ztp. They also believe that the attainment of a working title is a demonstration of Belastbarkeit. 
By putting a Rottweiler through its paces in its attainment of a working title, be it a CD, CDX, Tracking, Sch, etc., we gain valuable information about the strengths and weakness of its temperament. In some countries, the attainment of a working title is so highly prized, that a conformation championship title is only awarded when a working title has been previously achieved. Assessing character, the dogs ability to deal with corrections, stress, and its level of enthusiasm while working, tells us much about its mind-set. Without this knowledge of temperament, one cannot have a complete picture for a breeding program.

3. Construction

Third in the pyramid is construction, a balanced, harmonious musculo/skeletal system in accordance with the blueprint of the standard. Understanding the construction of a Rottweiler is analogous to the building of a house. The builder (breeder) must adhere to the architects design (the standard), maintain a stable foundation and alignment of walls (the skeletal system), while creating continuity so that all the segmented parts of the house work together harmoniously (the locomotion of the dog). 
As a breeder, owner or exhibitor, it is important in the complete understanding of Rottweiler construction, to acquaint oneself with the skeletal anatomy of the dog. 
The standard dictates how the proportions and ratios, angles and layout of the skeleton should be so that the Rottweiler can gait with the highest efficiency in harmony with its breed type. This insures that its architectural design will best suit the Rottweiler for its task as a multi-purpose working/guard dog. 
A house must have structural integrity. Walls must be plumb, materials used in the construction must have strength to withstand ware and tear, and parts must work. This applies to the Rottweiler as well. Front and rear legs must be balanced, strong and straight, the back must be firm but flexible, angulations must be ample enough to support proper reach of the front and drive of the rear. There should be symmetry and harmony of the working parts as well as a defined amount of muscle mass to support the skeletal frame.
Like temperament, correct construction is the by-product of a thoughtful, careful, breeding program. A Rottweiler cannot develop good construction from within. With the exception of building stronger or larger muscle mass via a weight gaining and conditioning program, when a dog possesses an incongruity or imbalance in the skeletal system, it cannot be corrected. A short upper arm, long in the back, shallow sternum, east-west feet, low pastern, poorly angulated croup, etc. impedes efficiency. These problems are inherited from the pedigree. 
We have often heard exhibitors and breeders say, Dont worry, hell out grow this or grow into that. Unfortunately, ugly ducklings do not become swans! Problems related to the skeletal structure are indelible and take many generations to improve or correct. The most direct path for correct construction is to breed with pedigrees that possess it.

4. Locomotion

Fourth in the pyramid is locomotion. Because the Rottweiler was used for driving cattle, its modality for locomotion is demonstrated in the trot. Unlike the other aspects in this pyramid, construction and locomotion have inexorable linkage in that; exemplary gait is the result of outstanding structure. When a Rottweiler is correct in construction, according to the blueprint of the standard, this balanced skeletal architecture produces an unrestricted, harmoniously flowing powerful gait. 
Unfortunately, few Rottweilers possess construction with such a high degree of balance and harmony that they move with this ideal effortless grace. Similar to the levels of temperament, locomotion has differing levels of efficiency dependent upon the correctness of construction or conversely, the amount of imbalances within the dog. The more imbalances or incorrect construction the dog possess in its angulations and ratios, the more impedance occurs to free flowing gait. 
The best perspective to assess locomotion is to view the dog, going away, coming towards and in the side gait. When the dog moves going and coming, we assess its lateral displacement, which has influence on the lateral center of gravity. A correct front and rear assembly stabilizes the dog and prevents him from excessive side-to-side movement, similar to the effect of torsion bars in a car. Incorrect construction such as, out at the elbow, eastwest feet, crossing over, moving wide and fiddle fronts etc., destabilizes the center of gravity. These incongruities produce impedance, which requires more energy, puts stress on the bones and muscles and leads to fatigue.
In the side gait, we assess all the moving parts working together. Once in the trot and at a reasonable speed, not to fast or slow, the mechanics of the musculo/skeletal structure is set in motion. Here, we can observe the reach, the drive of the rear, spring of step, amount of ground covered, and temperament in the dogs willingness to perform, an important element. Within the side gait, we observe many examples of locomotion from exemplary to the unharmonious. 
Occasionally, we encounter a dog that appears to be sound in structure when standing still, but during the examination of the side gait, they show a short stride of the front legs and rear legs, or a mix of this with a correct front stride, but short rear drive. Here, a problem may exist that does not easily reveal itself. That is why gaiting in a small ring or by moving the exhibits once around does not do justice for the complete assessment. Adding to this mixture is the exhibit that is pushed or cajoled around the ring. Outwardly, the dog appears good in construction and theoretically should gait correctly but for some reason it has no willingness to perform. This is one example of how temperament plays a factor in gait.
The field of canine gait is complex and requires a good knowledge of anatomy, mechanics, breed type and purpose. It is important for the concerned breeder and student of the breed to gain at least a proficient knowledge of these topics to understand Rottweiler locomotion.
References
1. The Priority of Breed Type in the Rottweiler, Wolfson, Steve, Steve Wolfson publisher, 2003
2. The Dog in Action, Lyon, MacDowell, Howell Book House publisher, 1982 

Calvin - 2006 Service Dog Of The Year
Submitted by Beverly Bulson, Owner/Handler/Best Friend

Tagars Carbon Copy V Blazin, CD, RE, CI, CST, AXP, AJP, PDII, EAC, O-OJC, OGC, CL3, TT, CGC, TDIA

Pollocks initial interest in carting developed out of a very practical need. We were living on four acres in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, she explains. I was using a lawn tractor to get around and pick up all the rocks on the ground. Then it occurred to me that it might be better to use a dogcart. I had working dogs and I knew that Rottweilers were 
used for carting ... So she stopped by her local carriage store and had a wagon made.

A New Calling Takes Shape
Carting as more of a dedicated pursuit really got under way in 2000, when Dinky competed 
in the American Rottweiler Clubs first carting trial at the national specialty in Petaluma, California. There, Pollock also offered the kindergarten children touring the show rides in Dinkys cartand the kids joy told her she was on to something. The following year, both Dinky and Buzz earned their CS (Carting Started, On Lead) and CI (Carting Intermediate, Off Lead) titles, as well as a CST team title, placing first. At home in Pennsylvania, Pollock took the dogs and their cart to the annual PawsAbilities fund-raiser organized by Susquehanna Service Dogs in Harrisburg. Again, the cart rides for kidsincluding those with disabilitieswere an instant hit, and organizers invited Pollock, Dinky, and Buzz back the next year. These days, Pollock lives in Keysville, Virginia, where she breeds under the Asgard Rottweilers banner. This December, for the third year in a row, Pollock and her dogs will march in the towns Christmas parade. To get into the holiday spirit, Pollock decorates the cart with garlands and battery-operated lights, and fills a second wagon with plush Rottweiler toys and candy to hand out to children. Its a festive gesture, but one with another important purpose: In any parade, I take the candy and weave from left to right as we walk, says Pollock. The kids come forward to get the candy and it helps them get 
close to the dogs as well. 

Out and About, and Into the Classroom
Educating children and the public about dog safety is one of Pollocks passions. Dogs should be able to live in the community, she says. It sounds obvious, but unfortunately Pollock knows all too well that not everyone shares her view. When she and her family moved from Lancaster to Keysville in 2002, she was shocked to discover that her dogs were not given a warm welcome. In fact, they were feared. We could not secure homeowners insurance due to the communitys past experiences with Rottweilers and our breeds reputation. Back in Pennsylvania, Pollock had been giving her Dog Manners elementary school programs for over 15 yearsusing the AKC Safety Around Dogs and the AKC Best Friends kits to teach children how to behave around dogs. Knowing how effective they were, she decided to offer the programs as a Canine Ambassador in Virginia. She is also in talks with Virginia Senator George Allens office, pitching the idea of legislation that would require all schools to offer dog safety programs. It helped a lot when the locals had the chance to meet our dogs and see that they were well-behaved, she says. (Pollocks Asgard Rottweilers contract requires puppy buyers to complete obedience classes and to earn their CD and AKC Canine Good Citizen certificate on the dogs by the time they are 25 months.) 
Because of the bad publicity Rottweilers get, the cart rides and manners classes give me an opportunity to present the breed in a very positive way, she says. Her hope of convincing her new neighbors that her dogs arent monsters has been realized through her tireless work in the community. Many residents were surprised to see how sweet and calm Dinky and Buzz were, especially amid the clang and clamor of a parade.

Spreading the Word
After years of winning over crowds with her bouncy demeanor, Dinky, who is 12 and suffers from lymphangiectasia (an inflammatory intestinal disease which causes a loss of protein), is retiring from carting, relinquishing her duties to another of Pollocks dogs, Ch. Acosta Mobsters Carolina Lily, who will join Buzz for upcoming appearances. Id recommend carting to anyone with sound dogs built for the work, Pollock says, but she does stress the importance of having the right equipment and well-fitting harnesses. Whatever the activity, Pollock hopes that more and more breeders will become Canine Ambassadors. 
I would love to see more people in the dog sport get involved in the community, says Pollock. My feeling is: Youve got to get your dog out of the show ring. Not that she doesnt enjoy conformation, or the agility and rally events her dogs compete in. But seeing the dogs bring joy to people outside the dog world goes a long way toward 
nourishing the soul: I find it just as rewarding as a championship.

First published in the December 2006 issue of the AKC Gazette. Used with permission.

THE ABUSE EXCUSE and WHY ITS BAD FOR DOGS
Julia V. McDonough

We are a nation of animal lovers. Raised on Bambi and Black Beauty, we grow up believing in the inherent innocence and good nature of all creatures, and in the notion that if left to their own devices, all animals would
exist in a sort of modern Peaceable Kingdom. When someone adopts a dog from a shelter or rescue agency, there is an assumption that the dog is there solely because of some heartless negligence or outright violence.
While this can be the case in all too many situations, a more honest look at the facts will show that most pets are given up to shelters by people who are not all that different than the people who wish to adopt or who work at the agency in question. Job relocation, divorce, a death in the family, loss of income, medical problems, and the threat of insurance cancellation for the owners of some breeds are the most common practical reasons people give up their dogs. While we are all familiar with the staggering numbers who are turned in for real or imagined behavior problems, even that diagnosis doesnt necessarily jibe with the invocation of abuse that usually accompanies it. If anything, the more common behavior problems associated with most surrendered dogs are symptomatic of an indulgent or at worst, benignly neglectful home where no one took time to address the issues before they got out of hand.
However, the cases of outright abuse against any animal are heinous enough to make the evening news, and will almost always find their way into the public eye. As animal lovers, we are horrified to hear about what a few truly brutal humans enact upon an animal unfortunate enough to cross their path. We feel a genuine surge of compassion for the beaten dog, the deliberately starved horse, and the litter of kittens saved from drowning, and we want to distance ourselves from the type of person who could commit such an act. It is proof of our empathy when such a story gets public attention in the media and hundreds of outraged citizens line up to adopt the victim. But it is also proof of our relative shallowness that the victims less notorious kennelmates at the shelter go unnoticed and unadopted, perhaps for lack of such a tragic back story. It may be cynical to say that many of the people who devote so much of their energy and emotion to shelter and rescue work feel best when they feel bad, but as someone who works full time in the shelter industry, I dont think its untrue.
Based on the horrific nature of the abuse cases which actually make the news and on the institutional support of their prevalence among some of the major fundraising humane organizations and animal rights groups, it only follows that an animal lover interprets any defensive, aggressive or predatory behavior on the part of his dog as being evidence of
some sort of abuse.

The other side of the coin: abuse as an excuse against adoption.
In the first year that I officially worked for DRU, I had an experience that Ill never tire of describing. A young couple had come to look at dogs. The man had done a lot of research and considered himself quite dog savvy. I stood with them in one of the large outdoor pens, where a candidate for adoption was trotting around. We were having a friendly conversation, occasionally punctuated by the nudge of the Dobermans nose, when suddenly the man stomped his foot violently in the direction of the dog, raising his arm above his head. the dog startled and decided to confine his explorations to the far
side of the pen. Well, that ones out, said the young man to his lady friend, Hes obviously been abused.
I asked the fellow what exactly that was that he had done. I had entertained the possibilities of some sort of Tourettes or a bad reaction to his cold medicine. But he informed me that he had been reading about temperament testing in one of the many dog books he was using, and that this test was engineered to diagnose past abuse, with the understanding that an abused dog is not going to be a good pet. He described pretty much all of the beliefs held by the Everything Has Been Abused contingent and informed me that the only reason a Dobe would turn on you was because he had been abused. I
let him go on for a few minutes, and during a pause in the conversation I jumped toward him, raising my arm. He shrank back, obviously surprised. You may want to look at a different guy, I told his girlfriend, This one has obviously
been abused.
While he wasnt happy about it, it made the point nicely. Strangers coming into a kennel to look at dogs (especially adult dogs of a breed which is perhaps a little suspicious of strangers) should NEVER take it upon themselves to raise their hands, shout, stomp or any of the other foolishness I have seen done in the name of checking for signs of
abuse. The most violently abused dog Ive trained (Roxie, who took a steel shovel to the back of the head) wouldnt blink if you swung a golf club at her. And some of the most lovingly treated dogs Ive worked with hit the deck when you clear your throat. My exhusbands admittedly spoiled Dobe, Ludwig, had lived with us since his conception: I caught him in my own hands as he was born. In many ways he lived a softer life than my dogs (although that life was still filled with fair limitations and training). Luddy never felt a human hand in anything other than an expression of affection. But if one quickly
raised one's hand to hang up the car keys or reach down a can of soup from the top shelf, he would cringe a little bit. He would fail this abuse test instantly. To think that a sweet but perhaps genetically soft dog much like Luddy might lose the chance at a great home because he had a fairly normal reaction to a sudden, unpredictable movement on the part
of some well-meaning but totally misguided person is hard to believe. But based on how many times Ive seen people do some type of extemporaneous temperament testing based on what they've read or heard from an erstwhile "expert", Im sure it happens at shelters all the time.
Some adopters tell us point blank that they dont want an abused dog. They assume that because we are a rescue, that most of our dogs are abuse cases. They further assume that if they take a dog which has been abused, there will be a huge problem. Sometimes, it feels like we are trying to "deprogram" this adopter from a cultish belief system as we try to convince him that even the most brutishly treated dog will be very pleased to move on and succeed if guided with compassion and balance . Its our job as responsible dog people to use our heads and not just our hearts, and to remember that there is both more and less to the abuse factor than meets the eye.
A rescued or shelter dog is more than his past experiences. He is a marvelous individual combination of genes, personality traits, nerve, humor and most of all, potential. Those who see him as a victim make him one. Ironically, that in itself is a serious form of psychological abuse: limiting a dogs ultimate potential in order to feel like we are protecting him from a past he would easily forget, if we would only let go of our hearts ego and allow him to do so.
2003 dobermind press

Around 200 people participated in the event, which took place Saturday and Sunday at Onslow Pines Park. Rottweiler enthusiasts came from as far as Florida and New York to participate in the club's third show.

"It's our sport; we go wherever we can to compete," said Alex Rodriguez of Nashville, Tenn. "I've had Rottweilers since I was 9 years old. I have a passion for the dog."

Rodriguez, who runs a construction company, travels as far as Europe each year for competitions - something he says is just a hobby. He entered four dogs in this weekend's show and took best overall male and female.

"It was just a beautiful show," he said. "It's worth it."

Rottweilers, which originate from Germany, were judged for structure, shape, color and breedability, said Trevor, who has entered her dogs in more than 40 shows. Her female Rottweilers took fourth place and her male took a second place this weekend.

Gerard O'Shea of Ireland came from Sweden to judge the show. He has worked with Rottweilers for over 25 years around the world.

"I love the education aspect of it," O'Shea said. "My main passion is the breed and being able to look at dogs and people in different cultures. I've judged dogs from eastern Russia to South America."

O'Shea gives each dog a specific critique, which Trevor says helps owners improve for future competitions. Training is a necessity for show dogs, who must stand still while judges inspect their teeth and other areas.

But training is important for all dogs, Trevor said, as a number of people cite lack of obedience when they give up a large-breed dog.

"If they aren't trained, they become too much to handle," she said. "If it's a working dog, it needs a job, even if that is just obedience."

For more information on the East Carolina Rottweiler Klub, call president James Bougie at 326-5835.

Contact staff writer Chrissy Vick at cvick@freedomenc.com or by calling 353-1171, ext. 239.

New-born lambs' Rottweiler 'mum'

Rottweiler Molly showing her maternal instincts with lambs Lucky and Charm. She has been doing exactly what a ewe would be doing" to look after the new-born lambs.

1st Published on BBC News

They have a fearsome reputation, but one Rottweiler is proving that the breed has a softer side by helping to rear two lambs.

I purchased 2 bitches, (Nafu and Pella) from a friend, Diane, who originally got them from Judy Johnson of Graudstark Kennels. When Diane got the bitches Judy told her one of them, Graudstarks Nafu could possibly have puppies born without tails. Diane got out of Rottweilers before ever breeding Nafu so she really didnt know if it was true or not. After I had Nafu for a little while we bred her to my Champion male Hy Tymes Kickin Ash (Monti). Her first litter Nafu had one pup born tailless. I thought "this is very cool" but didnt really tell anyone except for a couple of my closest friends. When I decided to breed her to Monti again, I mentioned to a few people that I wondered if she would have any tailless pups in this litter. Well she had 5 pups and 2 were born completely tailless, one pup has a tail that is very short and 2 were born with normal tails. I have pictures of them when they were first born and I am documenting them for myself and anyone who thinks it isnt possible. Nafus pedigree doesnt contain a lot of well-knowns.  Monti has sired a few other litters and all of his other pups have been born with full tails so my conclusion is that it has to be from Nafu.

Visit Hy-Tyme Rottweilers to see more of this litter!

A huge amount of work went into this event and we need to thank Cathy Rubens and Bob Busby for the effort they put into getting the ball rolling and keeping it rolling. That is not to say that a lot of other people didnt put many hours of effort into the event both behind the scenes and at the show. Some of those folks, to name a few are Rebekah Pless, Michelle Lennon, Kay Lackey and many others. To those I havent named, please forgive me. My memory has never been good and as I age it isnt improving any!

Since I havent been able to make it to the Nationals, CRC or many Regional Specialties for several years the entry was the largest Ive seen for some time. Obviously I dont get out much! It was a pleasure to sit and watch the judging of a group of very nice dogs. 

One of the special things that went on all four days was the anti-BSL table. Volunteers manned the table from the start of judging to Best in Show. Information on the current problems facing owners of so-called vicious or aggressive breeds was presented to anyone who stopped by and items such as anti-BSL pins, buttons stating I own a dog and I vote , and auto magnets were available for the sum of a donation. Over the course of the four days, donations for anti-BSL efforts totaled $900.00! This surpassed everyones expectations and really pleased Bob. Id like to thank several folks who worked hard to make the BSL table a huge success. Suzi Faulkner, Denise Nardini, Diane Garnett, Tracy Fowler and Brona Hicks, thank you all for the time and effort you put into this important effort. For those whose names my miserable memory wont allow me to include, a huge thank you to you as well!!

Another part of this great weekend was the Judges Breed Study Seminar presented by Cathy Rubens. Those who participated in this event with ringside mentoring came from New York, Ohio, New Jersey and Florida. Everyone appreciated Cathy sharing her knowledge and expertise. Im sure they went home with a lot of new knowledge swirling about in their heads!

Not only did the ARC Region IV have Sweepstakes and Veteran Sweeps on Monday but at the Durham Kennel Club show on Saturday the entry of Rottweilers was supported by the American Rottweiler Club, Michelle Lennon, and Cathy Rubens. It was wonderful to see the young dogs as well as the veterans strut their stuff. We all enjoyed having two days of Sweeps. Next year will be even better, more to come on that.

I especially love the veterans. They usually make me cry because they seem so happy to be out there working again. Actually CH Hopehills Diamond Affair CD (Shea) made her mother cry on Monday. She went Best of Opposite Sex to Best Veteran in Sweeps on both Saturday and Monday. I had the privilege of handling her on Monday. Shea really doesnt need anyone to handle her. She tolerates us humans who think we need to be in the ring with her. After she won her class on Monday I came out of the ring with her to find her mother Kay Lackey sitting ringside sobbing. Kay was thrilled to see Shea enjoying herself so much. I think all of the veteran dogs and bitches looked like they were having a ball. I wish them many more happy years. 

Let me fill you in on the day of the Specialty. It started early with quite a few of us meeting to set up the trophy table. What an effort that was! There were loads of lovely trophies! We kept having to spread out more and more and ultimately added another table. Stuffed toys were also abundant. They were given out to the placing dogs in the ring during sweepstakes, were offered as trophies for second through fourth place winners in the regular classes and seemed to be multiplying as the day progressed. There were three Awards of Merit as well. Everyone went all out to make this day and Specialty something to remember. Many of the trophies in both conformation and obedience were donated in memory of Rita Welker, Welkerhaus Rottweilers. Rita was a long time breeder and champion of Rottweilers. Many of the donations in Ritas memory were actually trophies Ritas Welkerhaus dogs had won over the years. Many thanks to everyone who donated money, time, and trophies. You are all awesome! 

After the trophy table was set up, it was time for the judging to begin. First, Id like to thank all of the judges who did an excellent job and helped to make the weekend special. Fridays judge Suzan Otto, Saturdays Sweeps judge Diane Garnett, Cathy Rubens in the regular classes, Sundays judge Tony DiCicco, Mondays Sweeps judge Danny Moore and judging the regular classes Grace McGlynn. 

There were 5 point majors four days in a row! Looking for that last, elusive major in 2007? Keep reading!

Results for Friday 09/01/2006 Alamance Kennel Club Judge Suzan Otto

B CH. RUDEOS FOREVER CIMMERRON
OS CH. DORO SOLIDOS DARLIN DARLA
WD TEXADELS BEST MAN
RWD ETERNAL FIRES HEARTBREAKER
WB/BW VON WILHELMS JESSICA JAMES
RWB TAGARS I VANT IT ALL


Results for Saturday September 2, 2006, Durham Kennel Club 

Puppy and Veteran Sweepstakes Judge Diane Garnett

BSW VON WILHELMS JESSICA JAMES
BOSW ETERNAL FIRES HEARTBREAKER
BVSW GRANTS KHARBEN COPY
BOSVSW CH HOPEHILLS DIAMOND AFFAIR CD

Regular Classes Judge Cathleen Rubens

B/G1 CH. BERNKASTEL BMER
OS CH. LORALS IMAGE
WD/BW TARAGWYNS TIMEKEEPER
RWD DARKSTARRS ROCCOS REFLECTION
WB LORALS KARMA
RWB ETERNAL MOON DARK ESPRESSO


Results for Salisbury Kennel Club Sunday 09/03/2006 Judge Anthony DiCicco

B CH APOLLONIA ANYTHING GOES
OS CH. DORO SOLIDOS DARLIN DARLA
WD WOODROTTS WORTH THE WAIT
RWD TARAGWYNS TIME KEEPER
WB/BW VON ROXMARS RACING THE DESERT SUN
RWB TAGARS IVE GOT WHAT IT TAKES RN


Results for the ARC Region IV Specialty Monday 09/04/2006

Puppy and Veteran Sweepstakes Judge Danny J Moore

BSSW TARAGWYNS TIME KEEPER
BOSSW MYSTICS ESSENCE OF THE HEART
BVSW CH ETERNAL MOON LORD OF THE RING CD RA
BOSVSW CH HOPEHILLS DIAMOND AFFAIR CD

Regular judging Judge Grace Mcglynn

B/G4 CH WOODROTT ABBAZ KAZMOPOLITAN
OS CH ECKO RIDGES ALL ABOUT MATHILDA
AOM CH TAGARS IKON DO IT ALL RA
AOM CH APOLLONIA ANYTHING GOES
AOM CH VON GAILINGENS GAIUS MAXIMUS
WD/BW DORO SOLIDOS ETTORE THE HERO
RWD VON RIDDLES DESPERADO V MYSTIC
WB TAGARS IVE GOT WHAT IT TAKES RN
RWB SILVERHILLS HOT TAMALE
BP BARSTES TEJAS FOR CIMMERRON

If I have transcribed anything incorrectly or otherwise made an error please accept my sincere apologies!!!

One of my favorite parts of the day was the Parade of Rescues. That could be because I got to see one of my Katrina rescues again. Does anyone remember Dumpster? She now lives with a wonderful couple in South Carolina and has gone from being a skinny, sad, frightened little wild woman to a well-fed, well-behaved, well-adjusted and much loved little girl. I cried when I saw her. To say that she has fallen into the best situation one could want for any dog is an understatement. Bless you Tim and Verena. 

All of the dogs who participated in the Parade were obviously in such loving and caring homes. Many of them have overcome tremendous obstacles. Some are still struggling but those who have adopted them are patiently working them through their issues. To those who have any part in rescuing and those who have adopted the rescued, you are all jewels. Kiss and hug those babies for me.

Plan now to attend the 2007 ARC Region IV Specialty Labor Day weekend in Raleigh, NC. Im told the event will be a five day cluster with four days of sweeps!!!! Cathy says to polish up your puppies and come to Raleigh. And Barbara, PLEASE dont forget to bring the rum cake! Until then, see you all at the Nationals in the spring.

  In 1993 I bred my girl Cajun Arianna V Ashlind, CGC, TT, (only lacking majors to finish) to Multi-V1, BIS, BISS, SKC, AKC Ch Dillon Von Wacissa, CD, CGC, TT, HIC, RTD. That breeding produced my heart dog, Multi V1 Ch. Dillon's Rope the Moon, CGC, TT, HIC--Dooley. The last litter Dooley sired out of Franlynn's Majestic Amen produced Elric. A tall, gangly pup, tons of enthusiasim but lacking in ring presence. For some reason of the 3 sons I owned during Dooley's life, Elric was his favorite.
  In 2003 I left Florida and returned to Georgia to care for my ailing mother. On weekends Elric was my "demo" dog for some small obedience classes I taught. My symptoms worsened gradually over the next couple of years. I could no longer endure walking on hard surfaces for any length of time due to severe joint pain and muscle cramps. Sitting on the floor or ground made getting up difficult, even getting out of bed was painful. I had to avoid the 12 steps up from my backyard and exit through the gate and go to the front door. It was while sitting on the ground playing with my dogs that Elric began to try and assist me. He would stand near and allow me to support on him to get up. Soon no matter where he was if I said "help" he was right there assisting me. Napping on the sofa found him near by and ready to help me up and wait until I was ready to walk. Soon he began to walk with me and even help me up the stairs. When my hands are full he has learned to open the screen door and pick up items. I often joke that I don't know how many commands he knows as we only speak conversational English that do not sound like commands.
  I had stopped so many activities because I would begin to limp severly and Elric now helps much like a cane to relieve some of the weight on painful joints. All my energy had to be focused on earning income as I am my only source of income. Recently I was able to limit my home health care job to remaining with one patient for 8 hrs instead of running from patient to patient. My patient is fond of Elric and he now accompanies me to my patients' home and does duel duty as assistance/therapy dog on a daily basis.
  It has been wonderful to have his help and a joy to see a working dog performing work he loves and as an added benefit the community sees a Rottweiler in such a positive light and we are able to educate so many. I am so grateful to Elric for giving some of my mobility back to me with so much love.

There are a few things about Tom Tilden that you should know:

He's not some sort of softie animal nut. He'd never even had a dog before Bernie, his 8-year-old Rottweiler. He realizes Bernie probably won't beat the bone cancer that led to the loss of a front leg in January. And he's not doing anything extraordinary by giving Bernie a custom-made wheelchair to help her get around after her surgery. He's just doing what anyone would do when faced with a loved one's serious illness: He's trying to buy more time.

Tilden can relate to Bernie's plight in a way that few others could. He's been in a wheelchair since 1986, when a training accident in the Army left him a paraplegic.

"Before my accident, I was talking to an Army buddy about people who were paralyzed, and I said to him, 'If that ever happens to me, I want to die.' One month later, my back was broken and I became a paraplegic. My first thought was, 'I want to live.' It's probably the same for Bernie."

The 40-year-old Tilden, a freelance editor who lives in North Seattle, grew up in Eastern Washington, the youngest of eight children of a farmer who didn't believe in having indoor animals.

Eight years ago, his future wife, Nancy, said to him, "I love dogs." Tilden figured they were having a hypothetical discussion, so he replied, "I love dogs, too." He soon found out that what this really meant was, "Let's get a dog together."

When the couple went on a fact-finding mission to a kennel, they vowed they would not come home with a puppy. Then 13-week-old Bernie, a gal with an eye on the future, crawled onto Tom's lap, and it was all over.

"I had no idea what I was in for," he says. "I didn't know how much Bernie was going to become a part of me. If I had, I probably wouldn't have gotten her."

From the outset, Tilden and Bernie were inseparable, spending "every waking hour within 10 feet of each other." They participated in competitive obedience training for two years, the major requirement for which is reciprocal trust and devotion.

Bernie was such a star that Tilden tried her at sheep herding, and she excelled. "She was gentle enough to herd ducks," he explains. More important was Bernie's skill with people. "When we went for a walk," says Tilden, "everyone would notice how well-behaved she was. I wouldn't know any of my neighbors if it weren't for Bernie."

Early last year, Tilden noticed that Bernie was tiring easily and that her enthusiasm for herding had waned. After having surgery to repair a torn ligament in her right hind leg, she was still limping.

The vet thought she had a sprain, but when it failed to heal, the Tildens got a grim diagnosis: Bernie had an aggressive type of bone cancer in her left front leg.

Tilden knew he couldn't leave a fallen comrade. "Bernie never gave up on me, and I wasn't going to give up on her," he says.

The Tildens debated about how many extra miles they were willing to go with Bernie, and then decided that her best chance would be amputation of the cancerous limb, followed by chemotherapy.

This could buy Bernie another 18 months. Without the amputation, she would have had three months at the most.

"My accident," Tilden says, "influenced me to believe that just because a dog doesn't have a leg doesn't mean she doesn't want to be alive."

The Tildens have been working to get Bernie accustomed to her wheelchair. She still yaws to one side, but Tom is confident she'll get the hang of it. It's a matter of getting the cart to bear enough weight, without taking so much weight off that she doesn't have good traction.

The custom-made wheelchair takes some of the weight off her remaining front leg, which will help to protect her from arthritis and other joint problems. The $1,100 chair was made by Doggon' Wheels, a custom canine-cart manufacturer in Bozeman, Mont.

Bernie will have to get over her prejudice against wheelchairs. "She's suspicious of everybody else in a wheelchair," says Tilden. "She even barks at them on TV."

So far, she's doing well. She is receiving a drug that was tested at the University of Wisconsin and found to extend cancer patients' lives by up to six months. She has finished her chemotherapy and still receives regular acupuncture, chiropractic care and treatment with Chinese herbs. She also goes swimming twice a week at Wellsprings, a canine hydrotherapy studio in West Seattle.

"The swimming optimizes what Bernie has left," says hydrotherapist Sheila Wells. "In the olden days, people would just shoot a dog if it got a broken leg. Now you can get them into the pool one week after surgery, or as soon as the stitches have healed."

Swimming provides Bernie with exercise, with relief from weight-bearing and with the chance to do a job.

One of Bernie's jobs is to continue to heal and adjust to her new wheels. But perhaps her biggest job is one that just comes naturally: not to give up. "The thing that makes Bernie happiest," says Tilden, "is a job well done."

If one were to take a survey asking, Why did you purchase a Rottweiler, Why this breed over others, it would certainly elicit intriguing answers. I cannot say for sure what the attraction others had to the Rottweiler when first encountered, however for me, it was his raw masculine appeal, his unique head and the impressive musculature and power he exuded. From his appearance, one could easily understand that this was a serious dog! Not alone in this view, many other Rottweiler aficionados have recognized this hallmark of the breed and expressed a similar perspective as well. After all, is not the look of a dog that makes the first and lasting impression? Surely, his breed type is what makes the Rottweiler unique The Germans understood the Rottweilers distinction when they came together to codify the standard at Heidelburg, Germany in 1907. They were deliberate when articulating and fixing the appearance of the Rottweiler, which is why the standard uses detailed language in its description of this essential aspect of breed type. The standard was modified since 1907, but the general appearance of the Rottweiler has not. Reading the current standard, one finds the word powerful written 6 times, bone mentioned 3 times and muscle mentioned 5 times. No other words have such repetition when describing the details.

Excerpts from the standard: 

The ideal Rottweiler is a medium large, robust and powerful dog - Dogs are characteristically more massive throughout with larger frame and heavier bone than bitches - His bone and muscle mass must be sufficient to balance his frame, giving a compact and very powerful appearance - Neck- Powerful, well muscled - Loin is short, deep and well muscled - Legs are strongly developed with straight, heavy bone - Upper thigh is fairly long, very broad and well muscled - Lower thigh is long, broad and powerful, with extensive muscling - His movement should be balanced, harmonious, sure, powerful and unhindered, with strong forereach and a powerful rear drive Despite his distinctive breed type and the words used in the blueprint to describe it, a negative, subtle change has occurred over the years, which ultimately is disastrous to his appearance.



Currently in the US, which is observable both in the show-ring and out, is a great loss in the 
general power of the breeds masculine design. Now, a rarity and an oddity, the once major factor in the 
breeds appeal, its power and substance, were put on the back burner in many breeding programs. One must look carefully to find this trait; the breed has lost its distinction. On the street, we encounter Rottweilers that are a poor representation of once was. They possess pin heads, narrow, snipey, muzzles, and spindly bones, no muscle mass and shallow frames. To the knowledgeable, these Rottweilers appear to be a mix breeding, although they are not. To the unknowledgeable, they appear to be correct! In the show-ring, this problem has crossed the boundaries. One should expect poor examples of the breed on the street since they are comprised of non-show dogs. However, the show ring should be the exception. Presently, many exhibits share the same problem of their street cousins and are only a notch or two above. Many exhibits that enter the show-ring are constructed well but are also as weak in substance, spindly in bones and musculature as their pet counterparts are. Now, when a dog or bitch that is in the ring with correct breed type, exuding power and substance, it appears as the odd man out. A strong masculine dog or powerful bitch seems strange among exhibits with spindly frail bodies and Doberman-like heads. To the newbie's and unknowledgeable judges, it is untypical and put at the end of the line. Often, I have heard that a female, which possesses strong bones, muscle and a powerful head, is now deemed too strong and considered a doggy bitch. What was once correct and typical is now abnormal. The dogs, which should embody power and masculinity, are now so weak in type they can be considered beautiful females!

WHAT ARE CORRECT BONES AND MUSCLES?

The standard does not give a numerical value for the appropriate bone mass or muscle, only a verbal guide. Therefore, to state a formula, Dog x must have y amount of bone and muscle to be correct is not possible. To understand what is appropriate for the correct amount for these attributes, one must refer to the blueprint. From the standard: His bone and muscle mass must be sufficient to balance his frame, giving a compact and very powerful appearance. A reasonable guide when assessing an exhibit, one should ask, Does this exhibit exemplify a powerful appearance? - Is the bone and muscle mass substantial, so that its appearance exudes power? One should be impressed with the overall appearance for power, muscle and bones.

A. BONE MASS

Bones mass should be thick enough in width so that it appears to support the frame of the dog in 
a substantial and powerful manner, without being refined, elegant, too massive or grotesque. 
The place to visually assess the bone mass on a Rottweiler, correct or incorrect, is the 
thickness in the radius/ulna and humerus. When making an evaluation, the dog is presented head on so that the full width of the chest (from East to West) can be seen. If a numerical evaluation for the 
thickness of the bones is desired, it is measured by using a tape measure and wrapping it around the 
circumference of the pastern (see Fig.1). Here is where the least amount of skin, muscle and tendon can be found. Correct bone mass is correlated to the height. The taller the dog, the more bone mass it should possess, compared to dogs of lesser height. Additionally, bone mass should always be proportionate and balanced to the frame of the dog. Out of balance is not correct. Good examples of this are the extremes. They are exhibited when a tall dog possess long, fine bones of the radius/ulna and humerus, giving the appearance of spindles, or when a short dog possesses too strong bone mass appearing like tree trunks. These dogs are out of balance. The Rottweiler is not a St. Bernard or a Dobermann.

B. MUSCLE MASS

The general muscle mass should be substantial, well defined and in proportion to the frame of the dog so that it exudes strength, masculinity and athleticism. The muscles should be apparent, yet not overpowering, like the Bull and Pit Bull Terriers. The muscle groups that comprise this appearance are the muscles of the front and rear assembly. 
In the front assembly, the muscles of the shoulders, the upper arm and forearm should be well developed and obvious. These muscle groups are the Deltoids, Biceps, Triceps and the Extensor muscles of the radius/ulna. In the rear assembly, the muscles of the Gluteus and Biceps Femoris should be well developed and defined. Viewing the rear muscles from the back, the depth and width of the Biceps Femoris and Gluteus should be full, supporting the Femur (see Fig.2). Here is where all forward locomotion begins.




C. THE CORRELATION OF MUSCLE AND BONE

With human body-building, the muscles can be developed, shaped and improved, with discipline, 
hard work, good nutrition and much sweat. However, improvement has limits, since body-building is 
dependent upon the size, mass of the muscle groups and bone substance. In essence, you are what you 
inherited. The thin framed, fine boned man or woman will always work harder and strain longer to build 
bulk and definition in the muscle tissue. With this body type, a major factor is bone mass! Strong bone 
mass is supported by thick muscles. The same principles hold true for the Rottweiler. 
Dogs and bitches that are fine boned possess muscles, which are light in their mass and often 
show little or no definition. This type, will always work very hard to make strides improving and 
developing what it inherited from the pedigree. Conversely, there are those dogs/bitches, which impress 
us with their natural well-developed musculature and powerful bone mass. Their musculature is correlated 
to their robust bone mass.

BREED TYPE IS A STEPCHILD 

Why is the great majority of Rottweilers here in the states, (especially in the show ring), not uniformly masculine in type with powerful muscle and bones, which is specified in the standard? Why have they become slight in bone, shallow in substance, and soft in appearance? The answer is breed type has become a stepchild. In the US, the accent is on the best possible construction demonstrated by superior gait. Those dogs, which display this attribute, are the ones that win in the show-ring. Placing the accent on this attribute is both good and problematic. It is good since all concerned breeders have this as one of 
their goals in mind when planning their next litter. Sound construction, in accordance with the breed standard is essential. All exhibitors want to win in the show-ring; therefore, many breeders make superior gait their only goal. With this as their prime directive, many breeders have made a detrimental detour; they traded breed type for locomotion. This is problematic. Often, at ringside, one can hear spectators and breeders alike say, Oh that dog moved beautifully with great reach and drive, It was well put together. Yes, that could be said however, the dog looked more like a Doberman than a Rottweiler. Excellent construction with outstanding gait is not breed type. These two attributes are separate entities in a breeding program and are not mutually interchangeable or should be misconstrued for breed type. Over the years, the masculinity of the Rottweiler, here in the states, has slowly eroded. Its masculine power and substance, clearly specified in the standard, has been oozing away. Spindly, fine bones with narrow long muzzles and smooth body lines have replaced broad top skulls, wide, short muzzles and powerful bones and muscles. Working character has also eroded and replaced with many Rottweilers that are shy and lack confidence in their temperament. This is a negative and detrimental trend. Once set in motion, it is extremely difficult to reverse. One only has to see our European and International counterparts by comparison to understand the differences in breed type and working temperament. In the international community, the accent is placed on breed type and working temperament. Some would argue there is nothing to improve. All is well within the Rottweiler and breed type is where it should be. That is a myopic view. It is valuable and healthy for all concerned to step out of the trenches and obtain an international perspective by making comparisons with our domestic breeding program and our international counterparts. Exchanging ideas and methods to improve genetics and techniques will benefit all. Additionally, it is extremely important to promote and make available more breed seminars in all Rottweiler clubs. There, is where real progress is achievable in an open dialog exchanging opinions and ideas. The benefactor of this is the Rottweiler.

References
Fiftieth Anniversary of the Allgemeiner Deutscher Rottweiler Klub, Powerhorn Press, 1978
American Rottweiler Club Standard, May 1990
Dog Anatomy-Illustrated, Way Robert VMD, MS Dreenan Press 1974
Der Rottweiler, Korn Hans 1939

Featured on the Oprah show
01-11-2006

Leana suffers from epilepsy. Her service dog Faith, a Rottweiler, has been trained to detect changes in Leana's body chemistry to warn her before a seizure hits. One night, after Leana went to bed, Faith refused to let her sleep.

"She jumped up on the bed and started running in circles," Leana says. "You have to listen to your service dog's instincts so I got out of bed and sat up with her."

Then, Leana went into the kitchen to make some hot chocolate. Moments later, she passed out. Leana hit her head on a cabinet and immediately started having grand mal seizures. Faced with a life-threatening emergency, 4-year-old Faith leapt into action. Faith ran for the phone and brought it to Leana, but when Leana didn't respond, Faith took charge! She went back to the base of the phone and pressed the speed dial for 911using her nose!

When the 911 operator picked up, Faith replied the only way she knew howby barking incessantly. "The dog that was barking was very insistent," says operator Jenny Buchanan. "It sounded like it was trying to say that there was some sort of a problemI checked to see what the address was and we sent officers out to see what the problem was."

After that miracle phone call, Faith then unlocked the front door and laid down next to Leana, keeping her safe until help arrived. Leana was hospitalized for three weeks after her fall; she is now back at home with her life-saving hero! 

Click here to view Faith's ACE award from the AKC.